Re: send hooks again .. not working

2002-10-15 Thread Rafael C. Gawenda
* Toby Coleridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-11 10:54 (CEST)] > nope still doesnt work I noticed that I have set from at the > top of my muttrc is this causing problems for send hooks? Lookup use_from in the manual. Perhaps you're mixing things up, where you have to choose only one way (my_hdr)

Re: send hooks again .. not working

2002-10-14 Thread Toby Coleridge
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 01:11:17PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote: > Toby Coleridge ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > > send-hook . unmy_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ^^^ > > Leave that out. > > > send-hook '~C @lboro.ac.uk' 'my_hdr From: me@myuniaddress' >

Re: send hooks again .. not working

2002-10-14 Thread Michael Tatge
Toby Coleridge ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > send-hook . unmy_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ^^^ Leave that out. > send-hook '~C @lboro.ac.uk' 'my_hdr From: me@myuniaddress' That should work. Michael -- Avoid the Gates of Hell. Use Linux (Unknown s

Re: send hooks again .. not working

2002-10-14 Thread Toby Coleridge
On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 09:26:19AM -0500, Aaron Schrab wrote: > At 15:18 +0200 12 Oct 2002, Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-12 00:06]: > > > I thought that you need to use "set from=" in send-hooks > > > instead of using my_hdr, but I might

Re: send hooks again .. not working

2002-10-12 Thread David Champion
* On 2002.10.11, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, * "Toby Coleridge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i have the following: > > send-hook . my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > send-hook @student\.lboro\.ac\.uk my_hdr From: me@myuniemailadrress > > however when I send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I get it fro

Re: send hooks again .. not working

2002-10-12 Thread Aaron Schrab
At 15:18 +0200 12 Oct 2002, Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-12 00:06]: > > I thought that you need to use "set from=" in send-hooks > > instead of using my_hdr, but I might misremember. No, it's the other way around. By the time send-hooks a

Re: send hooks again .. not working

2002-10-12 Thread Sven Guckes
* David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-12 00:06]: > * On 2002.10.11, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > * "Toby Coleridge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > send-hook . my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > send-hook @student\.lboro\.ac\.uk my_hdr From: me@myuniemailadrress > > > > however when I send

Re: send hooks again .. not working

2002-10-11 Thread Toby Coleridge
Nope no other send hooks defined .. On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 11:59:37AM +0200, René Clerc wrote: > * Toby Coleridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11-10-2002 11:55]: > > [Michael] > > > send-hook '~C student.lboro.ac.uk' 'my_hdr From: me@myuniemailadrress' > > > nope still doesnt work I noticed that I hav

Re: send hooks again .. not working

2002-10-11 Thread René Clerc
* Toby Coleridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11-10-2002 11:55]: [Michael] > > send-hook '~C student.lboro.ac.uk' 'my_hdr From: me@myuniemailadrress' > nope still doesnt work I noticed that I have set from at the top of > my muttrc is this causing problems for send hooks? Do you have other send-hooks,

Re: send hooks again .. not working

2002-10-11 Thread René Clerc
* Toby Coleridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11-10-2002 12:50]: > I do however have this in my sendmail.mc / cf : > > define(`confDOMAIN_NAME', `4mationnet.com')dnl > > because I am behind a private network and I get lots of 550 returned mail. > > would this make a difference? I don't know, I know n

Re: send hooks again .. not working

2002-10-11 Thread Michael Tatge
Toby Coleridge ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 11:42:44AM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote: > > send-hook '~C student.lboro.ac.uk' 'my_hdr From: > > me@myuniemailadrress' > nope still doesnt work I noticed that I have set from at the top of my > muttrc is this causing problems f

Re: send hooks again .. not working

2002-10-11 Thread Toby Coleridge
I do however have this in my sendmail.mc / cf : define(`confDOMAIN_NAME', `4mationnet.com')dnl because I am behind a private network and I get lots of 550 returned mail. would this make a difference? Thanks Toby. On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 11:10:11AM +0100, Toby Coleridge wrote: > Nope no other s

Re: send hooks again .. not working

2002-10-11 Thread Sven Guckes
* Toby Coleridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-11 10:10]: > > > > send-hook '~C student.lboro.ac.uk' 'my_hdr From: me@myuniemailadrress' > > > nope still doesnt work I noticed that I have set from at the > > > top of my muttrc is this causing problems for send hooks? > > Do you have other send-hook

Re: Send Hooks ..

2002-10-11 Thread Sven Guckes
* Toby Coleridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-10 20:25]: > If I setup two send hooks as follows: > send-hook ."my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;" > send-hook blah "my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;" what are the semicola for? delete them. > am i right in thinking that the second send > hook w

Re: send hooks again .. not working

2002-10-11 Thread Toby Coleridge
No the email address in the compose window is still wrong ... ? Toby On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:10:05PM +0200, René Clerc wrote: > * Toby Coleridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11-10-2002 12:50]: > > > I do however have this in my sendmail.mc / cf : > > > > define(`confDOMAIN_NAME', `4mationnet.com')d

Re: send hooks again .. not working

2002-10-11 Thread Toby Coleridge
Hi Michael, nope still doesnt work I noticed that I have set from at the top of my muttrc is this causing problems for send hooks? Thanks Toby. On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 11:42:44AM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote: > Toby Coleridge ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > > i have the following: > > > > send-

Re: send hooks again .. not working

2002-10-11 Thread Michael Tatge
Toby Coleridge ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > i have the following: > > send-hook . my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > send-hook @student\.lboro\.ac\.uk my_hdr From: me@myuniemailadrress send-hook '~C student.lboro.ac.uk' 'my_hdr From: me@myuniemailadrress' HTH, Michael -- "...Deep Hack Mode--

Re: Send Hooks ..

2002-10-10 Thread René Clerc
* Toby Coleridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-10-2002 22:27]: > If I setup two send hooks as follows: > > send-hook . "my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;" > send-hook blah "my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;" What's with the semicolons? > am i right in thinking that the second send hook will be activa

send-hooks (was: Re: Send Hooks ..)

2002-10-10 Thread Jussi Ekholm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Toby Coleridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If I setup two send hooks as follows: > send-hook . "my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;" > send-hook blah "my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;" > > am i right in thinking that the second send hook will be activ

Re: send-hooks don't work

2001-10-26 Thread Manuel Hendel
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 05:30:08PM -0600, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 11:42:56PM +0200, Manuel Hendel (dis)graced my inbox with: > > Hallo, > > > > I'm using mutt 1.3.x. I use send-hooks to define the "my_hdr From:", > > "my_hdr Organisation:" and the signature. If write th

Re: send-hooks and save_name

2001-03-08 Thread Gary Johnson
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 11:29:23AM -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote: > Well, with that I end up with > > send-hook . 'set folder=~/Mail' > send-hook concordia.ca 'set folder=~/Mail/conu' > send-hook !concordia.ca 'set folder=~/Mail/personal' > > and, as you can see, that first condition never

Re: send-hooks and save_name

2001-03-08 Thread Ben Rosenberg
How about using Procmail rules to put your mail where you like? * Rich Lafferty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010308 08:56]: =>On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 11:47:00AM -0500, Peter Kovacs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: =>> On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 11:29:23AM -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote: =>> > folder-hook . 'set fol

Re: send-hooks and save_name

2001-03-08 Thread Rich Lafferty
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 11:47:00AM -0500, Peter Kovacs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 11:29:23AM -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote: > > folder-hook . 'set folder=~/mail' > > send-hook concordia.ca 'set folder=~/mail/conu' > > send-hook !concordia.ca 'set folder=~/mail/personal

Re: send-hooks and save_name

2001-03-08 Thread Peter Kovacs
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 11:29:23AM -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote: > folder-hook . 'set folder=~/mail' > send-hook concordia.ca 'set folder=~/mail/conu' > send-hook !concordia.ca 'set folder=~/mail/personal' how about: send-hook . 'set folder=~/mail/personal' send-hook concordi

Re: send-hooks and save_name

2001-03-08 Thread Rich Lafferty
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 08:14:49AM -0800, Gary Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 11:02:03AM -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote: > > > I tried playing with changing the value of "folder" with a send-hook, > > but since it doesn't reset immediately after, it mungs up normal > >

Re: send-hooks and save_name

2001-03-08 Thread Gary Johnson
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 11:02:03AM -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote: > I tried playing with changing the value of "folder" with a send-hook, > but since it doesn't reset immediately after, it mungs up normal > operations (since I still want "folder" to just be "~/mail/"). > > Is there a straightforwar

Re: send-hooks

2000-11-08 Thread Goblin
I've found my stupidity. I know regex, so I should have seen this right away. ^@domain.com will always be a no-grok. Thanks anyway. On 11/08, Me rearranged the electrons to read: > Can someone help me? I've got the following lines in my .muttrc: > send-hook '~f ^@domain\.com$' 'my_hdr From: Use

Re: send-hooks not reset

2000-10-24 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Adrian Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 24 Oct 2000: > > send-hook . 'unmy_hdr From:' > >Is this classified as a bug, or a feature? :) It's a feature, a design desicision. Since you can use any muttrc command in send-hooks, it would be unworkably complex to try to limit the scope to

Re: send-hooks not reset

2000-10-24 Thread Dan Boger
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 05:32:15PM -0400, Adrian Chung wrote: > > exactly. when you set the sig, or a header, it's not only for that message. > > so you need to do something like: > > > > send-hook . 'unmy_hdr From:' > > send-hook . 'unset signature' > >Cool, so it's not just me... > >

Re: send-hooks a la Pine Roles.

2000-10-24 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Adrian Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 24 Oct 2000: >I've got alternates set, and I tried both set reverse_name and set > reverse_realname. I'm not having any luck with either. With mail > addresses to a different address (actually different user, same domain), > when I hit reply, I

Re: send-hooks not reset

2000-10-24 Thread Adrian Chung
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 05:22:30PM -0400, Dan Boger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 04:53:25PM -0400, Adrian Chung wrote: > > set from="Adrian Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" > > alternates="(support|achung)@mycompany\.(com|net|org)" > > > > send-hook '~f support@mycompany' 'my_hd

Re: send-hooks not reset

2000-10-24 Thread Dan Boger
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 04:53:25PM -0400, Adrian Chung wrote: > set from="Adrian Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" > alternates="(support|achung)@mycompany\.(com|net|org)" > > send-hook '~f support@mycompany' 'my_hdr From: company support ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' > send-hook '~f support@mycompany' 'set si

Re: send-hooks a la Pine Roles.

2000-10-24 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Using a large mallet, Adrian Chung whacked out: > when I hit reply, I get my username @ my.local.machine.name. likely you have to set the envelope sender too - post the relevant parts of your muttrc plz >Why don't you like qmail? it's an allergy of some kind :P I prefer exim (or i

Re: send-hooks a la Pine Roles.

2000-10-24 Thread Adrian Chung
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 11:13:30PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Adrian Chung proclaimed on mutt-users that: > > > The suggestions I've heard say to do something like: > > > send-hook \ > > '~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' \ > > 'my_hdr From: [EM

Re: send-hooks a la Pine Roles.

2000-10-24 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Adrian Chung proclaimed on mutt-users that: > The suggestions I've heard say to do something like: > send-hook \ > '~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' \ > 'my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]' set alternates, and set reverse_name > I'm assuming that this is a feature that

Re: send-hooks

2000-10-07 Thread Jason Helfman
I have this at work too. However, I incorporated folder-hook for this function, and it works very nicely. Folder-hook and send-hooks, used with each other seemed to do the trick for me. If you use $edit_headers that should do the trick though, i would think. On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 04:41:33PM -0

Re: send-hooks

2000-09-19 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Darren West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 19 Sep 2000: > If I invoke mail(compose) from within mutt via keybind 'm' in a folder > though, it always pops into the default profile..since the send-hook is > dependant on the "To" info. > It would be great if it first prompted for "To" info, then c

Re: send-hooks matching "all" users - how?

2000-08-26 Thread Randall Hopper
Mikko Hänninen: |Oh, right. That's the usual "|'s in patterns must be quoted" issue. | |Try this: | | send-hook "^~C '(jim|john|joe)@home.com'" "set pgp_autoencrypt" | |Or if that doesn't work, try escaping (\) the |'s, or double escaping... |It's a known issue, sort of a bug, in the way

Re: send-hooks matching "all" users - how?

2000-08-14 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Randall Hopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 14 Aug 2000: > Well, I tried that before my original post. Here is the error Mutt > generates on start-up: > > Error in /home/rhh/.mutt/lists.mutt, line 29: parentheses not balanced > Error in /home/rhh/.muttrc-1.2i, line 205: source: errors i

Re: send-hooks matching "all" users - how?

2000-08-14 Thread Randall Hopper
Mikko Hänninen: |Randall Hopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sun, 13 Aug 2000: |> manual.txt suggests a leading '^', but this doesn't work. Maybe |> it only works where you can specify a pattern flag, as in: ^~C \.de$ | |Well, you *can* do this with send-hooks. If you only specify a

Re: send-hooks matching "all" users - how?

2000-08-14 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Randall Hopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sun, 13 Aug 2000: > manual.txt suggests a leading '^', but this doesn't work. Maybe > it only works where you can specify a pattern flag, as in: ^~C \.de$ Well, you *can* do this with send-hooks. If you only specify a pattern, but no pattern op

Re: send-hooks

2000-08-13 Thread Wari Wahab
Well, well, well, after looking around, it doesn't help to have a send-hook . 'my_hdr From: Wari Wahab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' ;) Talk about massive oversight ;) Thanks dude * Suresh Ramasubramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000814 11:02]: > Using a large mallet, Wari Wahab whacked out: > > How do I se

Re: send-hooks

2000-08-13 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Using a large mallet, Wari Wahab whacked out: > How do I send a mail as a different user if I recieved the mails as the > other users... (Is that proper english?;).. For example, if someone > sends a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I want to reply it as > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get what I mean? Can't seem

Re: Send-Hooks

1999-12-19 Thread Sean Rima
Hi Mikko! On Mon, 20 Dec 1999, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > > > Ah. Well, then, you probably want to set "use_from" and "alternates" > > > in your .muttrc > > > > Both set and still no joy. I tried unsetting (commenting out) my defaults > > send-hook my_hdr but to no avail. I think I will just for

Re: Send-Hooks

1999-12-19 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Sean Rima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 14 Dec 1999: > On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, David T-G wrote: > > Ah. Well, then, you probably want to set "use_from" and "alternates" > > in your .muttrc > > Both set and still no joy. I tried unsetting (commenting out) my defaults > send-hook my_hdr but to no

Re: Send-Hooks

1999-12-14 Thread Sean Rima
Hi John! On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, John P . Looney wrote: > On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 02:39:23PM +, Sean Rima mentioned: > > Hi David! > > > > On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, David T-G wrote: > > > > > Sean -- > > > > > > If I understand you correctly, you want replies to email sent to your > > > yifan acc

Re: Send-Hooks

1999-12-14 Thread Sean Rima
Hi David! On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, David T-G wrote: > Sean -- > > ...and then Sean Rima said... > % Hi David! > > Hi there! > > > % > % On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, David T-G wrote: > % > % > yifan account to come from your softhome account, but mutt currently sets > % > > % > If that's correct, then

Re: Send-Hooks

1999-12-14 Thread David T-G
Sean -- ...and then Sean Rima said... % Hi David! Hi there! % % On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, David T-G wrote: % % > yifan account to come from your softhome account, but mutt currently sets % > % > If that's correct, then I believe you want to unset "use_from", and you % > might also want to specif

Re: Send-Hooks

1999-12-14 Thread John P . Looney
On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 02:39:23PM +, Sean Rima mentioned: > Hi David! > > On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, David T-G wrote: > > > Sean -- > > > > If I understand you correctly, you want replies to email sent to your > > yifan account to come from your softhome account, but mutt currently sets > > your

Re: Send-Hooks

1999-12-14 Thread Sean Rima
Hi David! On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, David T-G wrote: > Sean -- > > If I understand you correctly, you want replies to email sent to your > yifan account to come from your softhome account, but mutt currently sets > your from address as yifan when it sees that the email was sent there. > > If that's

Re: Send-Hooks

1999-12-14 Thread David T-G
Sean -- If I understand you correctly, you want replies to email sent to your yifan account to come from your softhome account, but mutt currently sets your from address as yifan when it sees that the email was sent there. If that's correct, then I believe you want to unset "use_from", and you m

Re: send-hooks

1999-09-19 Thread Stefan Troeger
Hi, On Sun, Sep 19, 1999 at 17:16 +0200, Moritz Schulte wrote: > ok, i´ve a question about send-hooks: > is there a possibilitie to let send-hooks affect only this one mail? > an exmaple: > pgp_autoencrypt is unset and i want mails to one andress get > encrypted. > if i set "pgp_autoencrypt" via

Re: send-hooks - cruel

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > In what way do they fail to work? > > Well, they do not set the headers or whatever, they just do not have > any effect. The only un-commented send-hook in the huge muttrc file you sent was one that tries to set the subject header. I believe there is

Re: send-hooks - cruel

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Many months of fiddling and I have not managed to get send-hooks to work. In what way do they fail to work? > Here is my muttrc - can you see why? No. They work for me, though. -- David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this: [