On 2002-03-01 Gary Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 10:57:17AM +0100, Christoph Maurer wrote:
> > On 2002-03-01 Will Yardley wrote:
> > > Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Rather often I get mails with attachments where the attachment is of
> > > > type application/octet-stream inste
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 10:57:17AM +0100, Christoph Maurer wrote:
> On 2002-03-01 Will Yardley wrote:
> > Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > >
> > > Rather often I get mails with attachments where the attachment is of
> > > type application/octet-stream instead of the correct type (let's say
> > > image/
On 2002-03-01 Will Yardley wrote:
> Christoph Maurer wrote:
> >
> > What does this patch do and where can I get it?
>
> i'm not sure where it's from; i put up a copy at:
> http://veggiechinese.net/021_patch-1.3.24.appoct.2
Many thanks, I'll give it a try...
Regards,
Christoph
--
Christoph
Christoph Maurer wrote:
>
> What does this patch do and where can I get it?
i'm not sure where it's from; i put up a copy at:
http://veggiechinese.net/021_patch-1.3.24.appoct.2
> Any advantages in comparison to:
>
> > http://www.davep.org/mutt/mutt.octet.filter
i don't use either, so i can't
On 2002-03-01 Will Yardley wrote:
> Alexander Skwar wrote:
> >
> > Rather often I get mails with attachments where the attachment is of
> > type application/octet-stream instead of the correct type (let's say
> > image/png). However, the attached file still has the correct extension
> > (eg. .pn
Alexander Skwar wrote:
>
> Rather often I get mails with attachments where the attachment is of
> type application/octet-stream instead of the correct type (let's say
> image/png). However, the attached file still has the correct extension
> (eg. .png or .PNG).
i think you need either the appoc
