On Apr 11, Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > IIRC mutt just sets the Fcc as for any "normal" mail.
>
> So what was fixed in 1.3.28?
Resend-message now honors $record and fcc-hooks.
Holger
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> * Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-11 14:12:05 -0400]:
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> > > * Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-11 05:59:50 -0400]:
> > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Johan Almqvist wrote:
> > > > > I
* Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-11 14:12:05 -0400]:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> > * Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-11 05:59:50 -0400]:
> > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Johan Almqvist wrote:
> > > > I have a problem that I don't like. When I use Esc-e to "re
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> * Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-11 05:59:50 -0400]:
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Johan Almqvist wrote:
> > > I have a problem that I don't like. When I use Esc-e to "resend" a message
> > > to someone (with edited contents) it doesn't get a
* Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-11 05:59:50 -0400]:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Johan Almqvist wrote:
> > I have a problem that I don't like. When I use Esc-e to "resend" a message
> > to someone (with edited contents) it doesn't get automatically Fcc'd.
> >
> > Why is that? How to fix?
>
* Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-11-02 05:04]:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Johan Almqvist wrote:
> > I have a problem that I don't like. When I use Esc-e to "resend" a message
> > to someone (with edited contents) it doesn't get automatically Fcc'd.
> >
> > Why is that? How to fix?
>
> This is
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Johan Almqvist wrote:
> I have a problem that I don't like. When I use Esc-e to "resend" a message
> to someone (with edited contents) it doesn't get automatically Fcc'd.
>
> Why is that? How to fix?
This is a good question. I have been wondering this myself. It has
only
