Re: Read-Markability by pattern

2000-02-14 Thread Randall J . Million
Perhaps you want the scoring function in mutt. It will not mark mail as read (automatically), but it will show the most important mails at the top so you can tell if one comes in. randy On Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 03:14:50PM +0100, Lukas Ruf wrote: > Hi Telsa, > > thanks for your reply. > > In fa

Re: Read-Markability by pattern

2000-02-14 Thread Lukas Ruf
Hi Telsa, thanks for your reply. In fact I already make heavy use of procmail just to filter and archive incoming emails. The point what I wanted here: There is one source of emails where sometimes important mails arrive othertimes they are just silly, but in fact I want to keep them all and

Re: Read-Markability by pattern

2000-02-14 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Lukas Ruf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 14 Feb 2000: > is there a possibility to specify within Mutt a function, that filters > the incoming emails and marks them as read if the pattern matches ? Sure. Based on your situation, I'd also suggest a procmail/maildrop filtering solution, like Tel

Re: Read-Markability by pattern

2000-02-14 Thread Telsa Gwynne
On Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 01:46:50PM +0100 or thereabouts, Lukas Ruf wrote: > Dear list, > > is there a possibility to specify within Mutt a function, that filters > the incoming emails and marks them as read if the pattern matches ? > > The problem: I receive lots of email -- some of them are imp