On 2000-02-09 22:29:51 -0500, Jim Breton wrote:
> Actually, I am setting the "pgp_sign_as" variable in my
> .muttrc... which is why I don't see why it wouldn't just pick the
> right algorithm based on that key.
Well, you are right that this would be possible. But I'm not really
sure it would be
On 2000-02-09 09:11:06 -0200, Jorge Godoy wrote:
> If I'm missing something, please tell me.
Think about the case of several private keys in your secret key
ring. Which key the underlying version of PGP uses for signing may
depend on settings in that program's configuration file, the order
of
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 09:19:27AM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2000-02-09 00:51:22 -0500, Jim Breton wrote:
>
> > Question though: is there any possibility of getting Mutt to
> > realize the correct mic alg for your default signing key? How
> > come it can't do this already, is it because
On 2000-02-09 00:51:22 -0500, Jim Breton wrote:
> Question though: is there any possibility of getting Mutt to
> realize the correct mic alg for your default signing key? How
> come it can't do this already, is it because it hasn't yet
> invoked GPG/PGP to see the list of keys?
The problem is t
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 06:51:25AM -0600, Christopher Uy wrote:
>
> Does this happen with any message you sign, no matter how simple it
> is? I know I had problems verifying signatures for a while, but the
> problem was intermittent and ultimately turned out to be related to a
> procmail bug and
On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 09:06:56PM -0500, Jim Breton wrote:
> I'm using gpg 1.0.0 with the IDEA and RSA modules loaded. It was all
> compiled from source.
>
> Same goes for PGP 5.01.
>
> With GPG as my "pgp_default_version" I have no problem decrypting
> and verifying signatures and messages ma
