Re: PGP Problem - Not on any doc (I think).

1999-06-14 Thread Eric Maquiling
--- Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The old way of just plain text sigs/etc just plain isn't "really > suited to Okay, I'm starting to understand. Looks like I need to do some more reading this week :( === Eric "emaq" Maquiling _

Re: PGP Problem - Not on any doc (I think).

1999-06-14 Thread J Horacio MG
Eric Maquiling dixit: ~> ~> > You missed one... read doc/PGP-Notes.txt that came with your Mutt ~> > distribution. ~> > ~> ~> I've also been looking for the answer to this. I've read and re-read ~> the PGP-Notes.txt and there is little documentation about whey pgp ~> messages are attachments ra

Re: PGP Problem - Not on any doc (I think).

1999-06-14 Thread Jeremy Blosser
Warning Could not process message with given Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Bu8it7iiRSEf40bY; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"

Re: PGP Problem - Not on any doc (I think).

1999-06-14 Thread Eric Maquiling
> You missed one... read doc/PGP-Notes.txt that came with your Mutt > distribution. > I've also been looking for the answer to this. I've read and re-read the PGP-Notes.txt and there is little documentation about whey pgp messages are attachments rather than the body of the message. === Eric

Re: PGP Problem - Not on any doc (I think).

1999-06-13 Thread Jeremy Blosser
Guy Cohen [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > i'vd searched in every document/faq/manual/archives i could find > befor posting. > My problem is in the way mutt sends a sign PGP message, > i.e not the regular -BEGIN PGP MESSAGE- but rather as an > attachment. i would like to know if there is a w