Re: Mutt Compile Problem

2000-07-02 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Marius Gedminas proclaimed on mutt-users that: >On Sun, Jul 02, 2000 at 01:06:29PM -0500, Donnie Pennington wrote: >> Well, you're absolutely correct. Mutt installed to /usr/local rather than >> /usr. Is something I could have tweaked to get the install to go to /usr >> instead? >Yes, the --pr

Re: Mutt Compile Problem

2000-07-02 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Sun, Jul 02, 2000 at 01:06:29PM -0500, Donnie Pennington wrote: > Well, you're absolutely correct. Mutt installed to /usr/local rather than > /usr. Is something I could have tweaked to get the install to go to /usr > instead? Yes, the --prefix=usr option to ./configure. However I prefer to

Re: Mutt Compile Problem

2000-07-02 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Donnie Pennington proclaimed on mutt-users that: >Well, you're absolutely correct. Mutt installed to /usr/local rather than >/usr. Is something I could have tweaked to get the install to go to /usr >instead? You can set the install directory when running ./configure. Or, you could just move t

Re: Mutt Compile Problem

2000-07-02 Thread Donnie Pennington
On Sun Jul 02 2000 at 03:40:45PM +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote: > This sounds like you did a `make install' and it installed everyting > into /usr/local, while your old mutt version is still in /usr. Try > running /usr/local/bin/mutt. If it works, you can rpm -e your old mutt > package. > > (Als

Re: Mutt Compile Problem

2000-07-02 Thread Lars Hecking
> I installed glibc-devel and ncurses-devel. The mutt compile acted like it > was working, but when I check mutt after the compile I'm still left with the > old one. Here is the latest config.log. The problem appears to be at line > 3593. This logs looks pretty ok to me. Did you do a 'make i

Re: Mutt Compile Problem

2000-07-02 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 10:20:49PM -0500, Donnie Pennington wrote: > On Sat Jul 01 2000 at 07:03:30PM +0100, Lars Hecking wrote: > > Ok. According to this, you won't be able to compile anything > > with your compiler. You need to install the glibc-devel RPM > > which includes essential files li

Re: Mutt Compile Problem

2000-07-01 Thread Donnie Pennington
On Sat Jul 01 2000 at 07:03:30PM +0100, Lars Hecking wrote: > Ok. According to this, you won't be able to compile anything > with your compiler. You need to install the glibc-devel RPM > which includes essential files like the startup codes for > C programs (crt1.o), and libraries and include

Re: Mutt Compile Problem

2000-07-01 Thread Lars Hecking
> Sorry for the wordwrap problem. I switched from gedit to joe. Maybe this > will look better. Indeed :) > Here is the config.log. How do I get "full configure output"? I'm only refering to the output from configure. But, in this case, config.log is enough to diagnose the problem. > co

Re: Mutt Compile Problem

2000-07-01 Thread Donnie Pennington
On Sat Jul 01 2000 at 04:46:23PM +0100, Lars Hecking wrote: > > [Argh - please wrap long lines. Makes reading easier.] > > Donnie Pennington writes: > > OK, I readily admit to Mutt newbie status. But I do have Mutt, Fetchmail and >Sendmail working apparently OK on my iMac with LinuxPPC. I'm u

Re: Mutt Compile Problem

2000-07-01 Thread Lars Hecking
[Argh - please wrap long lines. Makes reading easier.] Donnie Pennington writes: > OK, I readily admit to Mutt newbie status. But I do have Mutt, Fetchmail and >Sendmail working apparently OK on my iMac with LinuxPPC. I'm using the older mutt >that LinuxPPC provides an RPM for, but have trie