Thanks Tim and John. WN is doing what I was looking for
with tagged messages.
Interesting, the 'N' is case insensitive.
jl
On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 10:02:22PM +, Tim Chase wrote:
On 2022-10-02 17:23, Jon LaBadie wrote:
Maybe I'm overlooking something. A "mark as read" command
that works
Jon LaBadie wrote on Sun, 2 Oct 2022
at 17:23:17 EDT in :
> Maybe I'm overlooking something. A "mark as read" command
> that works with tagged messages.
You can use the set-flag command (bound to 'w') with atagged group, so:
;wN
to set the 'N' flag on the tagged messages.
And similarly cl
On 2022-10-02 17:23, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> Maybe I'm overlooking something. A "mark as read" command
> that works with tagged messages.
I've used W (clear-flag) to clear the N and O options, which can
be used as the operator for a ";"-work-on-tagged-messages if you
want.
-tkc
* Jon LaBadie [10-02-22 17:40]:
> Maybe I'm overlooking something. A "mark as read" command
> that works with tagged messages.
>
> Sometimes I'll select and tag a group of messages I want to
> do something with. Perhaps delete or perhaps save as a
> group. If I'm going to save them I might wan
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 02:13:03AM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 3:08 AM, Suvayu Ali
> wrote:
>
> >> I am guessing that you have set the 'trash' rc variable and/or the
> >> 'realdelete' offlineimap rc variable.
> >
> > I don't know what either of these variables do (I'm guessin
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 3:08 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:44:35PM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
>>
>> I see. So you do not have any such "archive" macro? And you do not use
>> the "All Mail" workflow of Gmail?
>
> This is correct. But I can still access "All Mail" over IMAP.
Hi,
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:44:35PM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
>
> I see. So you do not have any such "archive" macro? And you do not use
> the "All Mail" workflow of Gmail?
This is correct. But I can still access "All Mail" over IMAP. I just
don't sync it with OfflineIMAP. It would take up to
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:49 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> Hi Xu,
>
> Sorry I didn't respond, I got too busy with work.
>
> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 02:00:13AM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
>> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Xu Wang wrote:
>> >
>> > This helps a lot. I am starting to piece some things together
Hi Xu,
Sorry I didn't respond, I got too busy with work.
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 02:00:13AM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Xu Wang wrote:
> >
> > This helps a lot. I am starting to piece some things together. I am
> > not sure if I am rethreading or not. Looking at my .
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Xu Wang wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Suvayu Ali
> wrote:
>> Hi Xu,
>>
>> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 03:19:35AM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
>>>
>>> If you are curious about motivation, it is because GMail treats labels
>>> as different folders. So when we sync
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> Hi Xu,
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 03:19:35AM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
>>
>> If you are curious about motivation, it is because GMail treats labels
>> as different folders. So when we sync back, to have a message marked
>> as read in GMail, it must
Hi Xu,
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 03:19:35AM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
>
> If you are curious about motivation, it is because GMail treats labels
> as different folders. So when we sync back, to have a message marked
> as read in GMail, it must be marked as read in all labels (or in
> Mutt's point of vi
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 03:19:35AM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> In the pager or index, I would like to mark as read every message in
>> all mail boxes with the same message ID as the email that is
>> highlighted.
>
> There's no wa
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 03:19:35AM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> In the pager or index, I would like to mark as read every message in
> all mail boxes with the same message ID as the email that is
> highlighted.
There's no way to do this in Mutt proper... it does not have the
ability to
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 01:54:48PM +0200, Christian Ebert wrote:
> * Raphael Brunner on Wednesday, October 03, 2007 at 13:14:09 +0200
> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 11:49:18PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> >> Hmmm, there may be a limit on the length of a macro, which might be
> >> shorter depending on
* Raphael Brunner on Wednesday, October 03, 2007 at 13:14:09 +0200
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 11:49:18PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
>> Hmmm, there may be a limit on the length of a macro, which might be
>> shorter depending on your version of mutt. That's my first guess. My
>> other thought would
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 11:49:18PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 3 at 12:00 AM, quoth Raphael Brunner:
> >Thanks for this idea, but now I have this:
> >
> >1. the macro 'pager d' don't work (also the same without $my_resolve).
> >It seems, since the line is longer than before,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, October 3 at 12:00 AM, quoth Raphael Brunner:
>Thanks for this idea, but now I have this:
>
>1. the macro 'pager d' don't work (also the same without $my_resolve).
>It seems, since the line is longer than before, but why? I have exactly
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 04:30:11PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 2 at 11:21 PM, quoth Raphael Brunner:
> >many thanks! I changed the lines to this and it work now!
>
> Here's an improvement:
>
> folder-hook . 'set sort=reverse-date-received; \
> macro index d "set
> my_reso
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, October 2 at 11:21 PM, quoth Raphael Brunner:
>many thanks! I changed the lines to this and it work now!
Here's an improvement:
folder-hook . 'set sort=reverse-date-received; \
macro index d "set
my_resolve=$resolveset
resolve=noN=
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 02:56:31PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 2 at 09:35 PM, quoth Raphael Brunner:
> >folder-hook .'set sort=reverse-date-received; \
> > macro index d
> > "N=999-Trash^M"; \
> > macro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, October 2 at 09:35 PM, quoth Raphael Brunner:
>folder-hook . 'set sort=reverse-date-received; \
>macro index d
> "N=999-Trash^M"; \
>macro pager d
> "N=999-Trash^M"
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 01:42:04PM -0500, Drew Raines wrote:
> * "Carl B . Constantine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > How can I tell mutt to mark email as read.
>
>
r works but n doesn't toggle the new flag for me.
Chris
--
The only joy in the world is to begin. -Cesare Pavese
I use this:
macro index .c "T.\n;WN^T.\n" "Mark all messages as read"
No tabs, special chars, etc. Just copy and paste.
Hitting .c in a folder or mailbox causes all messages to be marked as
read. Much like the 'Catch up' function in mail readers.
HTH
L
On 07/11/01 11:34 AM, Carl B . Constan
* "Carl B . Constantine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> How can I tell mutt to mark email as read.
This unsets the "new" flag. You could also tag multiple messages and
<;>
--
Drew
25 matches
Mail list logo