It does, I believe. I am using it now with that. Qmail.
On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 01:06:55PM -0400, Forrest Aldrich muttered:
| Does or will MUTT contain maildir support?
|
|
--
/helfman
"At any given moment, you may find the ticket to the circus that has always
been in your possession."
Using a large mallet, Forrest Aldrich whacked out:
> Does or will MUTT contain maildir support?
Yes.
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Lumber Cartel India -
mallet @ cluestick.org + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis
There's so much plastic in this culture that vinyl leopard skin is
becoming an endange
On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 01:06:55PM -0400, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
> Does or will MUTT contain maildir support?
Mutt has contained Maildir support for a few years now... :-)
me
PGP signature
On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 05:17:47AM -0400, Russell Hoover wrote:
> Since procmail 3.14 supports the maildir mailbox format, I would assume that
> means, using it with mutt, that I can get rid of the maildir.c delivery program
> I've been using for the last couple of years,
>
> and that I can chang
On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 05:17:47AM -0400, Russell Hoover wrote:
> I know that I'm calling version 3.14 of procmail in my
> .forward file, and I use the trailing slash in all recipes.
Well, you're calling procmail from your .forward file? Which version of
procmail is the system wide one?
is procmai
Chris Gushue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 15 May 2000:
> How much
> of a speed difference would there be between that and mbox?
I think this is really rather subjective and per-system issue, whatever
figures someone else might come up with on their system might be totally
off the mark on you
Maildir is sounding more interesting to me all the time, with support for
it in procmail (can't remember if I knew about that before or not). How much
of a speed difference would there be between that and mbox? I'm currently
reading my mail on my 486 Linux box, and speed would be the main issue. I
On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 05:17:47AM -0400, Russell Hoover wrote:
> Since procmail 3.14 supports the maildir mailbox format, I would assume that
> means, using it with mutt, that I can get rid of the maildir.c delivery program
> I've been using for the last couple of years,
>
> and that I can chang
Russell Hoover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 15 May 2000:
> Since procmail 3.14 supports the maildir mailbox format,
... this is somewhat off-topic for this list, but well, I'll do my best
to answer your question.
> So how do I get the new procmail to deliver to maildirs without the previous
