On 1999-05-25 12:39:10 -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> I found this one on rufus earlier this week and mailed him to see if it's
> kept current and if I can link to it somewhere... I'd have to wonder if
> sticking it on Geocities is really kosher though. I'm pretty sure they are
> in the US.
Wel
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
On Tue, May 25, 1999 at 12:23:11PM +0200, Thomas Roessler said:
> On 1999-05-24 13:36:47 -0500, G. T. Francisco, III wrote:
>
> > I've just upgraded via RPM to 95.5i to take advantage of the compressed
> > folders patch. I did it via RPM as I'm really not that comfortable
> > compiling and instal
On Mon, May 24, 1999 at 02:12:52PM -0500, David DeSimone said:
> G. T. Francisco, III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > After upgrading, I've lost the ability to do PGP (I'm using PGP5),
> > e.g. if I get a signed message, I just get a "sh: v: command not
> > found" message.
>
> Mutt is tryin
On 1999-05-24 13:36:47 -0500, G. T. Francisco, III wrote:
> I've just upgraded via RPM to 95.5i to take advantage of the compressed
> folders patch. I did it via RPM as I'm really not that comfortable
> compiling and installing tarballs.
Just out of curiosity: What's the source for 0.95.5 RPMs w
G. T. Francisco, III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> After upgrading, I've lost the ability to do PGP (I'm using PGP5),
> e.g. if I get a signed message, I just get a "sh: v: command not
> found" message.
Mutt is trying to run the "pgpv" command, by taking your configured
"pgp" command and addi
