Re: Lists and marks

2001-04-17 Thread Andre Berger
* Dave Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2001-04-17 10:22 +0200: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 12:22:14AM +0200, Andre Berger wrote: > > > Now, can I also flag such messages as important > > automatically? I guess the "push" command is made for such cases, a little > > example would help

Re: Lists and marks

2001-04-17 Thread Dave Pearson
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 12:22:14AM +0200, Andre Berger wrote: > Now, can I also flag such messages as important > automatically? I guess the "push" command is made for such cases, a little > example would help me very much. I'd have thought that using procmail to do this would b

Re: Lists and marks

2001-04-16 Thread Andre Berger
* Dave Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2001-04-16 22:22 +0200: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 06:37:03PM +0200, Andre Berger wrote: > > > It would be convenient to have replies to my own postings to lists > > (threads I've posted in) automatically marked. What filter criterium can > > be used in this cas

Re: Lists and marks

2001-04-16 Thread Dave Pearson
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 06:37:03PM +0200, Andre Berger wrote: > It would be convenient to have replies to my own postings to lists > (threads I've posted in) automatically marked. What filter criterium can > be used in this case? If, by "marked", you mean coloured in some way you can do it by se