Hey Karl,
it may have sounded arrogant, but indeed it wasn't intended to sound
that. But...
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 10:35:31AM +1300, Karl. wrote:
> Given that you asked for advice, perhaps you should work on accepting
> all advice _graciously_, rather than being arrogant? You'll find it a
Yo
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 09:37:34PM +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 01:39:17PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > ls -la ~/.mutt/return_receipt
>
> You should work on you ability to _read_ mails others write _properly_.
Given that you asked for advice, perhaps you should
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 01:39:17PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> ls -la ~/.mutt/return_receipt
You should work on you ability to _read_ mails others write _properly_.
I told you, that the file _is_ executable. And as you eventually noticed
someone else already pointed the right solution out to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Patrick Schoenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-24-07 11:01]:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 04:53:23PM +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> > What information do you expect me to presentate? Eventually my whole mutt
> > configuration just to ask why one specifi
=- Patrick Schoenfeld wrote on Wed 24.Oct'07 at 17:18:54 +0200 -=
> and waits for an input ("read yn"), but mutt adds its "Press any
> key to continue...". So it seems that mutt already answers the
> question (what it shouldn't do). Also if I do press return to that
> question, it restarts the scr
=- Patrick Schoenfeld wrote on Wed 24.Oct'07 at 16:40:33 +0200 -=
> Why? According to what I read this works for macros, why shouldn't
> it work for message hooks?
Because macros operate on functions, while hooks operate on muttrc
commands. See http://WIKI.mutt.org/ -> MuttGuide -> Syntax for
det
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 05:38:55PM +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 05:30:45PM +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> > If you have used I think your stdin has changed to the
> > messages you piped. And read expects your answer from that filehandle.
> > So you might try expli
Hi Patrick!
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 05:30:45PM +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> > If you have used I think your stdin has changed to the
> > messages you piped. And read expects your answer from that filehandle.
> > So you might try explicitly s
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 05:30:45PM +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> If you have used I think your stdin has changed to the
> messages you piped. And read expects your answer from that filehandle.
> So you might try explicitly setting your tty with read yn
Hi Patrick!
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 04:56:13PM +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> > Do you mind formating your message with a width < 80 chars?
>
> no, thats no problem.
>
> > Depending on what your want try either or
>
> Hm. That and what Dav
Hi Patrick!
Do you mind formating your message with a width < 80 chars?
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> I want to write a script that _asks_ the user, if he wants to send a
> return receipt (note how that differs from your assumption that a
> macro would be suffice. For me it wou
Hi Christian,
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 04:56:13PM +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> Do you mind formating your message with a width < 80 chars?
no, thats no problem.
> Depending on what your want try either or
Hm. That and what Dave Evans wrote works, at least partially. Now the
script is lau
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 04:53:23PM +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> What information do you expect me to presentate? Eventually my whole mutt
> configuration just to ask why one specific message-hook (which I presentated)
> is not working?
There is only one information that I see that I really m
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 04:40:33PM +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> message-hook "~h Return-Receipt-To:" "|/home/schoenfeld/.mutt/return_receipt"
>
> And even though the specified file is a valid executable script mutt says
> (when
> I open this mail in the pager):
>
> |/home/schoenfeld/.mutt/
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 10:47:58AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Patrick Schoenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-24-07 10:42]:
> > And even though the specified file is a valid executable script mutt says
> > (when
> > I open this mail in the pager):
>
> first *guess* w/b that ~/.mutt/return_recei
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Patrick Schoenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-24-07 10:42]:
> I want to write a script that _asks_ the user, if he wants to send a return
> receipt (note how that differs from your assumption that a macro would be
> suffice. For me it wouldn't because w
16 matches
Mail list logo
