Thanks for your help :)
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter
wrote:
> * afshin afzali :
>> The last thing,
>> I could not find last release RPM package for EL5. Would you address
>> me where I would find it or mutt.spec to build it by myself?
>
> Can't help with that. I switched
* afshin afzali :
> The last thing,
> I could not find last release RPM package for EL5. Would you address
> me where I would find it or mutt.spec to build it by myself?
Can't help with that. I switched to Debian/Ubuntu a few years ago.
p@rick
>
> -- afshin
>
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 9:16 P
The last thing,
I could not find last release RPM package for EL5. Would you address
me where I would find it or mutt.spec to build it by myself?
-- afshin
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 9:16 PM, afshin afzali wrote:
> The SMTP support is implemented in 1.5.x versions. As stated in
> mutt.org the stabl
* afshin afzali :
> The SMTP support is implemented in 1.5.x versions. As stated in
> mutt.org the stable version still is 1.4.2.3!
> Do you recommend use of 1.5.x in production enviroments?
Yes, I recommend using the production version. I use it myself everyday:
p@x220:~$ mutt -v
Mutt 1.5.21 (20
The SMTP support is implemented in 1.5.x versions. As stated in
mutt.org the stable version still is 1.4.2.3!
Do you recommend use of 1.5.x in production enviroments?
Thanks,
-- afshin
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter
wrote:
> * afshin afzali :
>> Thanks to your advise. Do y
* afshin afzali :
> Thanks to your advise. Do you expect that sending to 1000 recipients
> on one SMTP session be less than invoking sendmail for 20 time?
Invoking the sendmail command is much slower, compared to a SMTP Session.
p@rick
>
> -- afshin
>
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Patri
Hi Patrick,
Thanks to your advise. Do you expect that sending to 1000 recipients
on one SMTP session be less than invoking sendmail for 20 time?
-- afshin
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Patrick Ben Koetter
wrote:
>
> * afshin afzali :
> > I'm using mutt to send bulk emails by postfix.
> > I'
* afshin afzali :
> I'm using mutt to send bulk emails by postfix.
> I'll appreciate if know there is any limitation on recipients count.
You could use a script to invoke mutt in batches of 50 recipients and have
mutt use the sendmail command.
You could also configure mutt to do a regular SMTP se
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 09:32:55PM +1300, Saujanya Patel wrote:
> Saujanya Patel wrote:
> >>You have to go via '-e' and use muttrc cmds.
>
> Okay clearly my mutt foo is week; anyone got an example?
Maybe this helps you:
mutt -e "set use_from" -e 'set from="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"' -s Subject
Saujanya Patel wrote:
Rado S wrote:
=- Saujanya Patel wrote on Mon 3.Nov'08 at 18:41:25 +1300 -=
I was wondering if it is possible to set the "from" value from the
command line without using the .muttrc file
Yes.
Something like:
mutt -s "subject" [EMAIL PROTECTED] -a a.file < someText -f [
=- Saujanya Patel wrote on Mon 3.Nov'08 at 18:41:25 +1300 -=
> I was wondering if it is possible to set the "from" value from the
> command line without using the .muttrc file
Yes.
> Something like:
> mutt -s "subject" [EMAIL PROTECTED] -a a.file < someText -f [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No.
You have to
Bright, Frank wrote:
> Does anyone know if mutt has a command line option for the reply_to?
No, but you can use the $REPLYTO environment variable, or the -e command
line switch to run a my_hdr command.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 04:58:24PM -0400, Bright, Frank wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know if mutt has a command line option for the reply_to?
There's no reply-to option, but the -e option will allow you to specify
a configuration command, so you could use that and the my_hdr command
like this:
* Bright, Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-28 08:35]:
> Does anyone know if mutt has a command line option for the reply_to?
no, there's no special one for that.
however, if you use "mutt -H file" then you
can stuff the Reply-To: line into that file.
Sven
Hi,
* David T-G [05/20/02 14:54:29 CEST] wrote:
[...]
> Ah. Well, if *that* is the case...
> What I would do is make a null-passphrase key pair specifically for this
> purpose.
Sounds good, but I generally don't like the idea to use
encryption with a null-passphrase key at my side.
> Then pu
Rocco --
...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
% Hi,
%
% * David T-G [05/17/02 15:43:40 CEST] wrote:
% > ...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
% > Well, yeah; the point was that we don't need mutt's cool features here
% > since the mail interface isn't doing the encrypting.
%
% Right, we (isn't it st
Hi,
* David T-G [05/17/02 15:43:40 CEST] wrote:
> ...and then Rocco Rutte said...
> Well, yeah; the point was that we don't need mutt's cool features here
> since the mail interface isn't doing the encrypting.
Right, we (isn't it still only me who wants to solve something ;-)
don't need mutt at
Rocco --
...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% * David T-G [05/16/02 19:04:13 CEST] wrote:
% > ...and then Rocco Rutte said...
% > % I just ask without much hope of success. I guess that there's
% > % no way to hand some text over to mutt and force it to encrypt
% > % it with a
Hi,
* David T-G [05/16/02 19:04:13 CEST] wrote:
> ...and then Rocco Rutte said...
> % I just ask without much hope of success. I guess that there's
> % no way to hand some text over to mutt and force it to encrypt
> % it with a public key (uid is known)?
> %
> % Okay, I knew it wouldn't work.
>
Rocco --
...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
% Hey,
Hiya!
%
% I just ask without much hope of success. I guess that there's
% no way to hand some text over to mutt and force it to encrypt
% it with a public key (uid is known)?
%
% Okay, I knew it wouldn't work.
I wouldn't give up yet. I do
msg.pgp
Description: PGP message
Carl --
...and then Carl Stehman said...
%
% Does Mutt have a command line option to send an e-mail
% message directly from the command line like
% "cat message |mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]" does for sendmail on
% standard Unix? without any interactive action needed?
You mean like "cat message | mu
Yes. mutt does the same thing. I believe that mutt even has an extra command
line option or two. read:
man mutt
man mail
Joel
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:33:02PM -0400, Carl Stehman wrote:
> Does Mutt have a command line option to send an e-mail
> message directly from the command line like
> "c
Barney --
...and then Barney Wells said...
% >
% > % don't get these type of files, I don't know any other way to
% > % install the program on SCO unix.
% >
% > Do you have a compiler, either stock or GNU, or is SCO one of those
% > horribly stricken *NIXes that has absolutely no compiling sup
> % If I use any other distributions I do not
> % get the VOL.000.000 files when they are extracted. If I
>
> Right; I've never seen 'em.
>
>
> % don't get these type of files, I don't know any other way to
> % install the program on SCO unix.
>
> Do you have a compiler, either stock or GNU,
Barney --
...and then Barney Wells said...
%
% --- David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
%
% > ...and then Barney Wells said...
% > % I am using mutt .93.1 on SCO UNIX 5.0.5.
...
% > % Also, the only version I could get working is the version that
% > % I found on the skunkware CD-ROM.
% >
% >
--- David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...and then Barney Wells said...
> % I am using mutt .93.1 on SCO UNIX 5.0.5.
>
> Wow, that's pretty old :-)
> % Also, the only version I could get working is the version that
> % I found on the skunkware CD-ROM.
>
> I take it, then, that you've do
Barney --
...and then Barney Wells said...
% I am using mutt .93.1 on SCO UNIX 5.0.5.
Wow, that's pretty old :-)
% I installed mutt last week, so my experience
% is one week old. I want my database to e-mail
% files to intranet users. This is done with the command;
%
% mutt -s test -a test.fi
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 07:20:38AM -0800, Barney Wells wrote:
> I am using mutt .93.1 on SCO UNIX 5.0.5.
> I installed mutt last week, so my experience
> is one week old. I want my database to e-mail
> files to intranet users. This is done with the command;
>
> mutt -s test -a test.file username
Alexander, et al --
...and then Alexander V. Konstantinou said...
% > % Right now I've achieved this functionality through a wrapper shell
% > % script that greps for the alias name and invokes mutt with the real
% > % user name.
% >
% > That makes sense, though it sounds somewhat painful.
%
%
> % Right now I've achieved this functionality through a wrapper shell
> % script that greps for the alias name and invokes mutt with the real
> % user name.
>
> That makes sense, though it sounds somewhat painful.
It is not really painful, or slow for that matter on my machine ...
Here is my qu
Alexander --
...and then Alexander V. Konstantinou said...
% As far as I can tell, mutt does not support openning the folder of
% a user based on an alias. For example, consider user "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
% that is aliased as "foo".
Yep.
%
% I'd like to be able to open the folder using "mutt -
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 04:00:21PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Using a large mallet, peter horst whacked out:
> > In using Mutt 1.25i on Linux 2.2.17-14, I notice that the
> > command line malfunctions, that is, that the backspace key
> > doesn't work properly (I hope that is the right
Using a large mallet, peter horst whacked out:
> In using Mutt 1.25i on Linux 2.2.17-14, I notice that the
> command line malfunctions, that is, that the backspace key
> doesn't work properly (I hope that is the right term, I'm
> referring to the line where you enter To:, Subject:, etc.,
> in an
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 02:17:07PM -0500, B . L . Jilek wrote:
> Every time I try to run mutt with this command it gives me a
> segmentation fault.
>
> mutt -s "subject" [EMAIL PROTECTED] < ~/file
>
> I can run this as root without a problem. I'm useing 1.2.5i on
> Slackware7.1 Can't seem to f
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 03:29:14PM +0800, Steve Marcionni wrote:
> I need to be able to send a mail message from the command line which allows
> me to attach a file. Can this be done without having the mail screen appear
> and making me select y to send the message ???
Yes, compose your message i
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 03:29:14PM +0800, Steve Marcionni wrote:
> I need to be able to send a mail message from the command line which allows
> me to attach a file. Can this be done without having the mail screen appear
> and making me select y to send the message ???
mutt -a file recipient < /d
On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 14:11:36 -0700, Marianne Albin wrote:
> you would just use mail, but there are many command line options to send
> the mail via mutt, but the editor still will open
Mutt will send mail in batch mode if its standard input isn't a
terminal:
$ echo "a one line message" |
you would just use mail, but there are many command line options to send
the mail via mutt, but the editor still will openmaybe there is an
option to make your editor false?
- Original Message -
From: "David Ursone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, July 5, 2000 11:52 am
Subjec
Mutt isn't the tool for this, try metamail, it has
a mail work-alike with intelligent and systematic
MIME extensions (and MIME is what specifies how
to encode non-us-ascii chars in header).
Sam
--
Sam Roberts, sam at cogent dot ca, www.cogent.ca
> (3) The receipient gets unreadable Subject lik
CN Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 27 Apr 2000:
> (1) Mutt does not provide command line option to specify/override
> "FROM:".
You can get around that by using "my_hdr From: blah " and
the -e command line switch, or by specifying an alternative .muttrc
file with the -F option.
> (3) The re
* Christian von Mueffling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000131 13:07]:
> In the Mutt doc (Part "6.1 Command line options") is written:
>
>-F specify an alternate file to read initialization commands
> But when i start mutt with '-F /somewhere/.muttrc' also my ~/.muttrc
> file is readed ... do i
Chris Zimmerman wrote:
> How can I send a message with an attachment from the command line? I
> see that mutt has a -a option that will allow for the attachment, but I
> need this to work without user interaction (as this will go into a cron
> job).
mutt -a /path/filename -s "subject" user@host
Chris Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How can I send a message with an attachment from the command line?
echo "Here is the enclosing text" | \
mutt -s "Here is your subject" -a attach_filename [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes
Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Has anyone ever managed to get mutt to do encoded attachments of multiple
> files from the command line like:
>
> mutt you -s "lots of pics enclosed" -a pic1.jpg -a pic2.jpg -a pic3.tif \
> -a redundantformat.doc
45 matches
Mail list logo
