Re: Command expansion

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 09:38:46:PM +0200 Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-27 16:35:14 +0100]: [...] > > So, as I said, a general solution. Sounds nice, at least to me. > But $signature is of type path. You can use a pipe there right now, > but the beh

Re: Command expansion

2002-04-01 Thread David T-G
Rocco -- ...and then Rocco Rutte said... % % Hi, Hello! % % On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 03:13:16:PM -0500 David T-G wrote: % > Rocco, et al -- % > ...and then Rocco Rutte said... % % > By the way, I find myself wondering how you tell mutt to not quote blank % > lines as you have here. Or do yo

Re: Command expansion

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 03:13:16:PM -0500 David T-G wrote: > Rocco, et al -- > ...and then Rocco Rutte said... > By the way, I find myself wondering how you tell mutt to not quote blank > lines as you have here. Or do you have an editor startup command that > changes all '^> $' to '' for yo

Re: Command expansion

2002-04-01 Thread David T-G
Rocco, et al -- ...and then Rocco Rutte said... % % Hi, Hello! % % On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 07:18:15:AM -0500 David T-G wrote: % > ...and then Rocco Rutte said... % ... % > That would probably be welcomed, after all of the talk % > of making fcc-save-hook able to save to a pipe so that a scr

Re: Command expansion

2002-04-01 Thread Nicolas Rachinsky
* Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-27 16:35:14 +0100]: > Hi, > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 07:18:15:AM -0500 David T-G wrote: > > ...and then Rocco Rutte said... > I try it onces more. > > What I thought of is functionality which would lead up this: *all* > variables of type 'path' are han

Re: Command expansion

2002-04-01 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 07:18:15:AM -0500 David T-G wrote: > ...and then Rocco Rutte said... > % The following doesn't work, too: > % > % set record='`date +/tmp/%H%M%S`' > Oh, I get it -- $record is only parsed once, so it will only be set once, > no matter what. Exactly. > % What I tho

Re: Command expansion

2002-03-27 Thread David T-G
Rocco, et al -- ...and then Rocco Rutte said... % % Hi, Hello! % % On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 03:29:58:PM -0500 David T-G wrote: % > % The problem is the following: if I would type fast enough to send a few % > % dozen mails a minute, I wanted to be abled to include the date and time % % > Heh

Re: Command expansion

2002-03-27 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 03:29:58:PM -0500 David T-G wrote: > % The problem is the following: if I would type fast enough to send a few > % dozen mails a minute, I wanted to be abled to include the date and time > Heh. And you talk about not wanting to spam! :-) You're lucky. I'm too ti

Re: Command expansion

2002-03-27 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 03:02:31:PM -0500 darren chamberlain wrote: > I think if you \ the backticks, they will be evaluated when the > variable is read, and not when the config is read. So, instead > of: > set record="`date +'%Y-%m-%d-%H:%M'`" > use something like: > set record="\`da

Re: Command expansion

2002-03-26 Thread David T-G
Rocco -- ...and then Rocco Rutte said... % % Hi, Hello! % % I send this to the user's list and not to developer's because I do not % want to 'spam' anybody. I think that -users is a good place for it. % % The problem is the following: if I would type fast enough to send a few % dozen mai

Re: Command expansion

2002-03-26 Thread darren chamberlain
Quoting Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Mar 26, 2002 14:55]: > The problem is the following: if I would type fast enough to > send a few dozen mails a minute, I wanted to be abled to > include the date and time in the file I specify by the 'record' > variable. Using `date`. But `date` is only exp