Re: ``$spool'' or ``$spoolfile''

2000-05-11 Thread David Ellement
On 000511, at 18:33:18, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > David Ellement <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 11 May 2000: > > This should change the remaining references to $spool to $spoolfile. > > Isn't that patch the wrong way around? Yes, I got diff backwards. -- David Ellement --- manual.sgml.head.

Re: ``$spool'' or ``$spoolfile''

2000-05-11 Thread Mikko Hänninen
David Ellement <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 11 May 2000: > This should change the remaining references to $spool to $spoolfile. Isn't that patch the wrong way around? You want *all* the references to be $spoolfile, not $spool. (Although I'd be all for renaming the Mutt variable too, but fo

Re: ``$spool'' or ``$spoolfile''

2000-05-11 Thread David Ellement
On 000511, at 09:13:18, Chris Green wrote: > There is a slight 'infelicity' in the mutt manual as it doesn't seem > to know whether to call the mail spool $spool or $spoolfile. For > example it says in the description of shortcuts:- This should change the remaining references to $spool to $spool