--cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Michael Leone spake thus:
> it's been my experience that the latest SA (v2.31) is much better at=20
> distinguishing real mail from spam than earlier versio
--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Ken Weingold spake thus:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2002, Kai Weber wrote:
> > + Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >=20
> > > Yeah, but with procmail I can send th
David Champion said:
> * On 2002.08.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> * "Ken Weingold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I would never do that. Sometimes Spamassassin catches real mail as
>> spam.
>
> If I could be so lucky. "Sometimes." Heh.
it's been my experience that the latest SA (v2.31) is
* On 2002.08.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Ken Weingold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I would never do that. Sometimes Spamassassin catches real mail as
> spam.
If I could be so lucky. "Sometimes." Heh.
--
-D.We establised a fine coffee. What everybody can say
S
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002, Kai Weber wrote:
> + Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Yeah, but with procmail I can send them to /dev/null. With
> > Spamassassin they go to my spam folder for review.
>
> You can use procmail to filter the spamassasin'ated mails to /dev/null,
> too.
I would never
+ Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Yeah, but with procmail I can send them to /dev/null. With
> Spamassassin they go to my spam folder for review.
You can use procmail to filter the spamassasin'ated mails to /dev/null,
too.
| :0
| * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
| /dev/null
Kai
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
> > add address to procmailrc. ;-)
>
> Get with the times, Sven! Adding an address to a Spamassassin blacklist
> is *so* much easier to maintain than a hairy mess of procmail rules ;)
Yeah, but with procmail I can send them to /dev/null. With
Spama
