also sprach Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.10.1305 +0100]:
> That doesn't make much sense to me. If I have a read message and I say
> "toggle-new", why would mutt assume that I really wanted to
> "toggle-old"? Perhaps what's needed is a different function?
Sure. I am not talking abou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, October 10 at 12:54 PM, quoth martin f krafft:
>also sprach Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.10.1245 +0100]:
>> current next
>>
>> !O & !N N <--- This is the crucial difference, right?
>
also sprach Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.10.1245 +0100]:
> current next
>
> !O & !N N <--- This is the crucial difference, right?
Almost, but yes. My argument is that this behaviour should depend on
$mark_old. If that's set, the result should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, October 10 at 11:59 AM, quoth martin f krafft:
>also sprach Michael Tatge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.10.1140 +0100]:
>> I'm confused. Do you want to remove the Old (and New) flag or set N for
>> a messages that was previously Old?
>
>Id
also sprach Michael Tatge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.10.1140 +0100]:
> I'm confused. Do you want to remove the Old (and New) flag or set N for
> a messages that was previously Old?
Ideally, I want to press N to do any of the following, depending on
context:
current next
~~~
* On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> also sprach Michael Tatge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.10.0720 +0100]:
> > Don't use . N removes the N flag if it's there
> > but doesn't add N if the message is not N.
> > If your goal is "O"ld messages anyway why have toggle-n
also sprach Michael Tatge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.10.0720 +0100]:
> Don't use . N removes the N flag if it's there
> but doesn't add N if the message is not N.
> If your goal is "O"ld messages anyway why have toggle-new at all?
Can you think of another way to toggle, which I've been using for
* On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> It seems impossible to remove the O flag on messages without the use
> of Wo, Wn, or NkN (assuming $resolve is set)
> Does anyone know of a better way to approach this?
>
> I came up with
>
> macro index,pager N ":set my_res
