On Wed, Jul 14, 1999 at 10:15:40AM -0700, wrote:
> I use mutt in command line mode to send mail.
> I would like not to send the mail directly but to print it on the
> standard output in a way to pipe it to another program
Why ?
If you want to send attachments from the commandline try mpack
Didier --
...and then didier said...
%
% Currently I do
%
% mutt -s "hello" [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.deja.com/ ==--
% Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
:-D
--
David Thorburn-Gundlach * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to l
(sorry for the loss of the subject yesterday)
Ok I explain again
(Liviu Daia was near the solution
I need the pipe function but in command line mode and not when using mutt normally)
Currently I do
mutt -s "hello" [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.deja.com/ ==--
Share what you know. Learn what yo
On Wed, Jul 14, 1999 at 03:29:23PM -0700, wrote:
> Re hello
>
> and thanks to those who answered but...
>
> maybe I didn't explain clearly...
>
> I know how to pipe to sendmail or other, but I don't know how to have mutt write
>the message to a file (or to the standard output)
>
> is t
Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I need to pipe the whole message with the headers and the body
>
> Use sendmail then...
>
> % cat some_file | sendmail
Good advice, but this won't work. Either do this:
cat file | sendmail -t
or
cat file | sendmail address1 address2
On Wed, Jul 14, 1999 at 11:17:43AM -0700, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I use mutt in command line mode and it works well.
> But as I want to use another program I need to pipe the message
>
> I need to pipe the whole message with the headers and the body
Use sendmail then...
% cat some_file | sendma
