On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 06:37:03PM -0700, John Iverson wrote:
>
> The corresponding .muttrc variable would be "sort", e.g.:
>
> set sort=threads
I like this combination:
set sort=threads
set sort_aux=date
--
David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=
* On Fri, 10 May 2002, Ricardo SIGNES wrote:
> On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 10:15:21AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > when in a folder. Can someone please tell me how to get the
> > threaded view where arrows are used to indicate a thread. I
> > have seen some example pictures on the web, but
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 10:15:21AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> when in a folder. Can someone please tell me how to get the threaded view where
>arrows are used
> to indicate a thread. I have seen some example pictures on the web, but I cannot
>find the appropriate
> settings in the muttr
Hi
At the moment my display in mutt looks like
8 O May 09 02:42:07PM To mutt-users ( 32) Re: about spam
9 O May 09 02:08:12PM To Mutt Users ( 21) Re: ailasing mailboxes
10 Os May 09 11:25:35PM To mutt-users ( 47) Re: emacs-goodies
11 O May 09 08:37:05PM To Mutt Users
Thanks, Igor and Will,
I've found that .forward (with procmail called) works for default postfix settings.
As mentioned by Will, those advanced settings of procmail should have
been set by default.
Now my procmail can work well with postfix.
The only pity is procmail doesn't work (return -1) i
Igor Pruchanskiy wrote:
> Anyway, Postfix is NOT using .forward files by default, which I think
> is a good thing.
i'm not sure this is the case, unless a vendor configuration has
specifically disabled this by default.
on my system, default settings appear to say pretty much the same thing
you
> While I'm on RedHat, not Mandrake, my suspicion is that Mandrake may be
> set up so that you do not need a .forward file for postfix. Have you
> tried running without the .forward?
Sorry for late reply, but i am just catching up on my 927 new messages in
mutt-users mailbox :)
Anyway, Postfix
* Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [31-12-2001 18:17]:
| René Clerc wrote:
| > * Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [31-12-2001 17:15]:
| >
| > > with postfix, just:
| > > "| /usr/bin/procmail -t"
| > >
| > > should be fine.
| > >
| > > the fancy sendmail style trickery shouldn't be necessa
Alas! John P Verel spake thus:
> While I'm on RedHat, not Mandrake, my suspicion is that Mandrake may be
> set up so that you do not need a .forward file for postfix. Have you
> tried running without the .forward?
Well, I've used Mandrake in the past (and Debian in the present), and to
my knowle
While I'm on RedHat, not Mandrake, my suspicion is that Mandrake may be
set up so that you do not need a .forward file for postfix. Have you
tried running without the .forward?
John
On 12/31/01, 07:05:28PM +0800, Charles Jie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to substitute Mutt with Mozilla.
>
> One
]:
>
> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 19:05:28 +0800
> From: Charles Jie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Please help verify my procmail settings to go with mutt
>
> Hi,
> I'm trying to substitute Mutt with Mozilla.
> One important porting work is dealing with the multipl
René Clerc wrote:
> * Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [31-12-2001 17:15]:
>
> > with postfix, just:
> > "| /usr/bin/procmail -t"
> >
> > should be fine.
> >
> > the fancy sendmail style trickery shouldn't be necessary.
>
> But, make sure in your postfix/main.cf the following line is pres
* Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [31-12-2001 17:15]:
| Charles Jie wrote:
| >
| > (My MTA is postfix (on Mandrake 8.1). Mutt is 1.3.24i. procmail 3.21.)
| > I wonder whether the following files (copied from 'man procmail') have
| > anything wrong. Help, please.
| >
| > * My ~/.forward:
| >
|
Charles Jie wrote:
>
> (My MTA is postfix (on Mandrake 8.1). Mutt is 1.3.24i. procmail 3.21.)
> I wonder whether the following files (copied from 'man procmail') have
> anything wrong. Help, please.
>
> * My ~/.forward:
>
> "|IFS=' '&&p=/usr/bin/procmail&&test -f $p&&exec $p -Yf-||exit 75 #jie"
Charles --
...and then Charles Jie said...
%
% Hi,
%
% I'm trying to substitute Mutt with Mozilla.
%
% One important porting work is dealing with the multiple accounts I keep,
% especially the mailing list.
Piece of cake with mutt.
%
% * But I found the flow of incoming mail dropping down.
Hi,
I'm trying to substitute Mutt with Mozilla.
One important porting work is dealing with the multiple accounts I keep,
especially the mailing list.
* But I found the flow of incoming mail dropping down. vim mailing list
sent me a message telling me my mail is bouncing.
On 12/28 and 29, I rec
After doing ./configure I am getting the message that
~ have already Installed
If is, indeed, the correct version, then,
What, please, do I need to do ?
Thanks
--
best wishes
Richard
sent on Linux
Here's my own first take at Solaris, from some documentation they
published on the web. Any confirmation or error report would be
welcome.
--
Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
# Source: http://www.sun.com/software/white-papers/wp-unicode/
#
# Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROT
In the infinite wisdom of the relevant standards groups, iconv's
character set names are application-defined, and may be just about
anything.
It would be a great help if you could, for as many platforms as
possible, try to produce simple lists mapping preferred MIME names to
iconv-accepted charac
On Friday, 10 November 2000 at 18:39, Kai Blin wrote:
> Forwarded to list.
>
> Hi Brendan,
>
> any idea about this?
Mikko handled this better than I would have. This is maildir, not IMAP,
right?
PGP signature
Kai Blin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 10 Nov 2000:
> Forwarded to list.
> From: Kimberly Vher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ya i tried to open the mail and its still the same.
Really? Ok, it's possible.
> >> please help me with my prob. when I run the c
Tuebingen Do molecular biologists wear designer genes?
ya i tried to open the mail and its still the same.
At 01:42 PM 11/8/2000 +0100, you wrote:
>* Kimberly Vher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08/11/00, 12:23:48]:
>
>> Dear mutt user,
>>
>> please help me with my prob. when I ru
* Kimberly Vher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08/11/00, 12:23:48]:
> Dear mutt user,
>
> please help me with my prob. when I run the command :
>
> mutt -f /home/user/Maildir
>
> I get all the messages have a length of 0?
Did you try to open the mails? I use IMAP and mutt
Dear mutt user,
please help me with my prob. when I run the command :
mutt -f /home/user/Maildir
I get all the messages have a length of 0?
I already read this in faq but they advise to use this in procmail. Is
there any other way how can i correct this problem?
Thanks in advance!
Sasha Borodin [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> I have read the online help manual all the way through, and can not figure
> this problem out. Just wondering if you can shed some light on this error
> message:
>
> Every time I try to send something, I get: "Error sending message child
> exited 127 (
Sasha,
What is your sendmail variable set to? The default works for me and
I am using qmail's sendmail wrapper/clone.
Jeff
Quoting Jeff Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello,
>
> I have read the online help manual all the way through, and can not figure
> this problem out. Just wondering if
I don't know what the error means, but I want to make sure you can use
another mailer. If you use PINE or kmail or netscape messenger, do those
work?
TomG
>Hello,
>
>I have read the online help manual all the way through, and can not figure
>this problem out. Just wondering if you can shed so
Hello,
I have read the online help manual all the way through, and can not figure
this problem out. Just wondering if you can shed some light on this error
message:
Every time I try to send something, I get: "Error sending message child
exited 127 ()."
1. I use sendmail all the time, it's con
28 matches
Mail list logo