On Sat, Sep 11, 1999 at 03:35:05AM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> > What I need is to be able to view my POP3 'folder' and delete
> > individual messages. Most of the newer Unix/Linux MUAs do in fact
> > work this way with POP3 folders, it makes them look just like ordinary
> > local folders to t
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 09:34:03PM +0200, Roberto Suarez Soto wrote:
> On 10/Sep/1999, Chris Green wrote:
>
> > What I need is to be able to view my POP3 'folder' and delete
> > individual messages. Most of the newer Unix/Linux MUAs do in fact
> > work this way with POP3 folders, it makes them l
Chris Green [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 09, 1999 at 06:10:10PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> > If you like Mutt so much, why not look instead at using another POP3
> > implementation (fetchmail) while still using Mutt? That's how it's
> > /supposed/ to work.
> >
> Fetchmail is equa
On 10/Sep/1999, Chris Green wrote:
> What I need is to be able to view my POP3 'folder' and delete
> individual messages. Most of the newer Unix/Linux MUAs do in fact
> work this way with POP3 folders, it makes them look just like ordinary
> local folders to the user. Using fetchmail with mutt
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Chris Green wrote:
>
> What I need is to be able to view my POP3 'folder' and delete
> individual messages. Most of the newer Unix/Linux MUAs do in fact
> work this way with POP3 folders, it makes them look just like ordinary
> local folders to the user. Using fetchmail wi
Chris Green:
> > Is there a way of telling the MUA to delete a message locally (and not
> > download it again) but leave it on the server to be picked up by a
> > different machine later?
> >
> No, I don't think you could do this. Effectively what you have in
> tkrat is what looks exactly like
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 01:23:00PM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> Chris Green:
>
> > What I need is to be able to view my POP3 'folder' and delete
> > individual messages. Most of the newer Unix/Linux MUAs do in fact
> > work this way with POP3 folders, it makes them look just like ordinar
Chris Green:
> What I need is to be able to view my POP3 'folder' and delete
> individual messages. Most of the newer Unix/Linux MUAs do in fact
> work this way with POP3 folders, it makes them look just like ordinary
> local folders to the user. Using fetchmail with mutt can't do this at
> all
On Thu, Sep 09, 1999 at 06:10:10PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> Chris Green [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > I have been using mutt on a number of different systems for quite a
> > long while (since something like version 0.7x I think). It has served
> > me well and has become steadily better. H
Chris Green [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> I have been using mutt on a number of different systems for quite a
> long while (since something like version 0.7x I think). It has served
> me well and has become steadily better. However I am now seriously
> looking at other MUAs and one of the main re
On Thu, Sep 09, 1999 at 01:35:15PM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
>
> If I receive an uninteresting message at one place and delete it, it
> still gets downloaded at the other place and I have to delete it
> again, which isn't ideal.
>
Quite, my method overcomes that problem.
I never leave
Chris Green:
> So - what I am beginning to do is move over to a mail program which
> has a good POP3 implementation (I'm pretty well settled on tkrat at
> the moment though Mahogany shows promise). This allows me to set up
> folders in my mail program which correspond to the POP3 mailboxes, I
>
I have been using mutt on a number of different systems for quite a
long while (since something like version 0.7x I think). It has served
me well and has become steadily better. However I am now seriously
looking at other MUAs and one of the main reasons is mutt's minimal
POP3 support.
Let me e
13 matches
Mail list logo
