Re: My sircam weirdness and Steve K's mailbox

2001-11-04 Thread Rich Lafferty
On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 02:07:05PM +, Steve Kennedy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > So, my message would have landed in Steve's moderator mailbox. Part of > > his mail system reacted poorly to the control characters in the > > message following and didn't separate it out as a separate > > mes

Re: My sircam weirdness and Steve K's mailbox

2001-11-04 Thread Cliff Sarginson
On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 02:07:05PM +, Steve Kennedy wrote: > On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 10:58:07PM -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote: > > > I have a theory as to what happened with that message I sent that was > > delivered to the list with another message, containing sircam, > > dangling off the end.

Re: My sircam weirdness and Steve K's mailbox

2001-11-04 Thread Steve Kennedy
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 10:58:07PM -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote: > I have a theory as to what happened with that message I sent that was > delivered to the list with another message, containing sircam, > dangling off the end. > I just sent a reply to Lars's post about that message, in that thread,

My sircam weirdness and Steve K's mailbox

2001-11-03 Thread Rich Lafferty
I have a theory as to what happened with that message I sent that was delivered to the list with another message, containing sircam, dangling off the end. I just sent a reply to Lars's post about that message, in that thread, and immediately got back a "queued for moderator approval" message. I'm