On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 05:25:32PM +0200, Byrial Jensen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 10:54:53 +0200, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 08:58:19PM -0400, Jim Toth wrote:
> > > Try changing the "resolve" variable.
> > >
> > > Something like
> > >
> > > macro index "set nores
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 10:54:53 +0200, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 08:58:19PM -0400, Jim Toth wrote:
> > Try changing the "resolve" variable.
> >
> > Something like
> >
> > macro index "set noresolve;d;set resolve" "Delete then go to next new
>msg"
> >
> > (untested)
>
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 08:58:19PM -0400, Jim Toth wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 03:15:07PM +0200, Cliff Sarginson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>said:
> > Hello,
> > A common sequence for me when reading new messages is to delete then
> > move to the next new message. My macro is as follows:
> >
> > m
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 08:58:19PM -0400, Jim Toth wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 03:15:07PM +0200, Cliff Sarginson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>said:
> > Hello,
> > A common sequence for me when reading new messages is to delete then
> > move to the next new message. My macro is as follows:
> >
> > m
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 03:15:07PM +0200, Cliff Sarginson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> Hello,
> A common sequence for me when reading new messages is to delete then
> move to the next new message. My macro is as follows:
>
> macro index d "Delete then go to next new msg"
>
> Unfortunately when y
Hello,
A common sequence for me when reading new messages is to delete then
move to the next new message. My macro is as follows:
macro index d "Delete then go to next new msg"
Unfortunately when you delete a new message the pointer goes to
the next message in the index, so if you have 3 new me
