Re: Mutt devnulled my message!

2008-08-15 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, August 15 at 03:17 AM, quoth dae3: > Granted, I'm using an old-ish version (1.4.2.2i) but I'll report this > just in case newer releases are still misbehaving. > > In short, Mutt sent my email and then chucked it into bit-heaven because >

Re: Mutt devnulled my message!

2008-08-15 Thread Marianne Promberger
On Friday, 15 August 2008, 10:10 (UTC+0200), dae3 wrote: > > BTW, the invalid Fcc I had specified was '.' (what I was trying to say > was "put it in the friggin' current mailbox!" - there *should* be a > quick way to say this, in case there still isn't). folder-hook . 'set record="^"' I don't kn

Re: Mutt devnulled my message!

2008-08-15 Thread Christian Ebert
* dae3 on Friday, August 15, 2008 at 03:17:13 +0200 > BTW, the invalid Fcc I had specified was '.' (what I was trying to say > was "put it in the current friggin' mailbox!" - there *should* be a > quick way to say this, in case there still isn't). There is: '^' (w/o quotes) c -- Was heißt hier

Mutt devnulled my message!

2008-08-15 Thread dae3
Granted, I'm using an old-ish version (1.4.2.2i) but I'll report this just in case newer releases are still misbehaving. In short, Mutt sent my email and then chucked it into bit-heaven because I had specified an invalid Fcc. That's bad! Very bad!! A nicer behaviour would have been backing up my

Mutt devnulled my message!

2008-08-15 Thread dae3
Granted, I'm using an old-ish version (1.4.2.2i) but I'll report this just in case newer releases are still misbehaving. In short, Mutt sent my email and then chucked it into bit-heaven because I had specified an invalid Fcc. That's bad! Very bad!! A nicer behaviour would have been backing up my