On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 06:09:18PM +, Dave Wood wrote:
> On (08:49 14/12/08), George Davidovich put forth
> the proposition:
> > On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 04:21:07AM +, Dave Wood wrote:
> > > Just testing 1.5.18 and noticed that now %s is showing in KBytes
> > > instead of bytes. Is there a
On (08:49 14/12/08), George Davidovich put forth the
proposition:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 04:21:07AM +, Dave Wood wrote:
Just testing 1.5.18 and noticed that now %s is showing in KBytes
instead of bytes. Is there a new format for bytes?
You'll get K only if the mailbox is smaller than a
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 04:21:07AM +, Dave Wood wrote:
> Just testing 1.5.18 and noticed that now %s is showing in KBytes
> instead of bytes. Is there a new format for bytes?
You'll get K only if the mailbox is smaller than a megabyte, otherwise
you'll get M.
I brought up the issue 6 months a
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 07:35:51AM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Dave Wood [12-13-08 23:23]:
> > Just testing 1.5.18 and noticed that now %s is showing in KBytes
> > instead of bytes. Is there a new format for bytes?
>
> No, I'm still on 1.5.13 and KBytes are shown, but it is %c, not %s.
> %
* Dave Wood [12-13-08 23:23]:
> Just testing 1.5.18 and noticed that now %s is showing in KBytes
> instead of bytes. Is there a new format for bytes?
No, I'm still on 1.5.13 and KBytes are shown, but it is %c, not %s.
%s represents the message subject in $index_format.
--
Patrick Shanahan
Just testing 1.5.18 and noticed that now %s is showing in KBytes instead of
bytes. Is there a new format for bytes?
--
The Kennedy Constant:
Don't get mad -- get even.
