Re: More newbie question SMTP

2000-06-08 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
clemensF proclaimed on mutt-users that: >> Suresh Ramasubramanian: > >> user foo with password bar mda "sed -e '1s/^\t/Received: /' | formail >|/usr/bin/procmail -d " > >or: > >mda "/usr/local/bin/procmail -t -f-" ESR recommends that extra received: line in the fetchmail faq, fwiw. I agree wi

Re: More newbie question SMTP

2000-06-08 Thread clemensF
> Suresh Ramasubramanian: > user foo with password bar mda "sed -e '1s/^\t/Received: /' | formail >|/usr/bin/procmail -d " or: mda "/usr/local/bin/procmail -t -f-" clemens

Re: More newbie question SMTP

2000-06-07 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Nils Vogels proclaimed on mutt-users that: >On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 09:10:28PM -0400, Sergei Gerasenko wrote: >> > Wouldn't it be much simpler to make mutt sendmail using /usr/lib/sendmail -t ? >> > That way you wouldnt need to have the daemon running, right ? >> >> Yes, but how about receiving

Re: More newbie question SMTP

2000-06-07 Thread Nils Vogels
On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 09:10:28PM -0400, Sergei Gerasenko wrote: > > Wouldn't it be much simpler to make mutt sendmail using /usr/lib/sendmail -t ? > > That way you wouldnt need to have the daemon running, right ? > > Yes, but how about receiving mail? > Timothy asked very specificly about send

Re: More newbie question SMTP

2000-06-07 Thread Aaron Schrab
At 00:25 +0200 08 Jun 2000, Nils Vogels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wouldn't it be much simpler to make mutt sendmail using /usr/lib/sendmail -t ? > > That way you wouldnt need to have the daemon running, right ? Mutt already does that. Well, it doesn't actually use the -t option because it pa

Re: More newbie question SMTP

2000-06-07 Thread Sergei Gerasenko
> Wouldn't it be much simpler to make mutt sendmail using /usr/lib/sendmail -t ? > That way you wouldnt need to have the daemon running, right ? Yes, but how about receiving mail? -- "Trust me": Translation of the Latin "caveat emptor."

Re: More newbie question SMTP

2000-06-07 Thread Nils Vogels
On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 06:14:39PM -0400, Sergei Gerasenko wrote: > > I would prefer not to be running a smtp daemon at all times. > > So, how should I configure my smtp? > > Well, actually it's not necessary to run sendmail at all times. I think > inetd can call sendmail on demand. Just include

Re: More newbie question SMTP

2000-06-07 Thread Sergei Gerasenko
> I would prefer not to be running a smtp daemon at all times. > So, how should I configure my smtp? Well, actually it's not necessary to run sendmail at all times. I think inetd can call sendmail on demand. Just include the corresponding line in your inetd.conf. Look at the man page of sendmail

Re: More newbie question SMTP

2000-06-07 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Timothy Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 07 Jun 2000: > Now the newest problem is sending. I have a tremendous hate relationship > with Sendmail, so I use Postfix pretty much everywhere, however on my > puny little notebook computer where I live, I would prefer not to be > running a smtp da

More newbie question SMTP

2000-06-07 Thread Timothy Grant
Hi again, OK, so fetchmail->procmail->mutt now work correctly Colours aren't working right but I'm getting closer Thanks for everyone who assisted on the above problems. Now the newest problem is sending. I have a tremendous hate relationship with Sendmail, so I use Postfix pretty much everywh