On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 10:08:23 +0930, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> I do not know
> about getting rid of the 'yes' response, but there could be a way.
There is no way but the source. That is mutt_query_pipe_attachment()
in recvattach.c. It might be a candidate for a quadoption...
--
Byrial
http:
On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 03:59:13AM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 28 Oct 2000:
> > I always get confused about what the
> > menu are called.
>
> A final usage tip -- I got confused too, until someone pointed out to me
> that the menu's name appe
On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 10:08:23AM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> OK, I'll just clean up this lot and then I let people on the list know
> how to use type I remailers with mutt.
Looking forward to it. :)
It would certainly be good if we could get Mixmaster to work, too. Remailers
are essenti
Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 28 Oct 2000:
> I always get confused about what the
> menu are called.
A final usage tip -- I got confused too, until someone pointed out to me
that the menu's name appears at the top of the help screen when you
press '?'.
Good to hear things
On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 03:28:56AM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 28 Oct 2000:
> > It prompts for my filter script and then needs a
> > "yes" reply as it warns it is overwriting the mutt-hostname-number file
> > in /tmp.
>
> You can probably get
Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 28 Oct 2000:
> It prompts for my filter script and then needs a
> "yes" reply as it warns it is overwriting the mutt-hostname-number file
> in /tmp.
You can probably get rid of that "yes" reply -- I'm not sure of this,
but I would expect that to
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 10:13:55AM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
> Brian Salter-Duke muttered:
> > On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 01:47:06AM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> > > Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 26 Oct 2000:
> > > > In the attach menu after saving the message, I
> > > > wan
Mikko Hänninen muttered:
> PS. No need to send emails to me privately, I'm on the list (as the MFT
> header in this email should indicate...).
I'm sorry Mikko. I replied to Brian's message, and _are_ listed in the
MFT-Header of that message. Sorry for any inconvenience. I just didn't
pay attentio
Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 27 Oct 2000:
> It is not the attachment I want to filter and F is filter-entry for the
> attachment. I want to alter the message itself.
Like Brian Tatge already said, the message body *is* an attachement,
from the MIME point of view (and how th
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 06:34:36AM +0930 or so it is rumoured hereabouts,
Brian Salter-Duke thought:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 11:21:59AM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
>
> mv /tmp/new-file /tmp/mutt*
>
> This works. I can now just hit "y" to send the mail. However of course
> it would fail if
Brian Salter-Duke muttered:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 01:47:06AM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> > Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 26 Oct 2000:
> > > In the attach menu after saving the message, I
> > > want to modify the message considerably by piping it to a script. The
> > >
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 01:47:06AM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 26 Oct 2000:
> > I am not sure whether I am doing something the right way, but I have
> > come up against a wall. In the attach menu after saving the message, I
> > want to modify
Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 26 Oct 2000:
> I am not sure whether I am doing something the right way, but I have
> come up against a wall. In the attach menu after saving the message, I
> want to modify the message considerably by piping it to a script. The
> modifications a
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 11:21:59AM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> I am not sure whether I am doing something the right way, but I have
> come up against a wall. In the attach menu after saving the message, I
> want to modify the message considerably by piping it to a script. The
> modifications
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 11:17:11PM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote:
> I was messing around with backing up mail with my Qmail server, and
> there is a utility that comes with it called, maildir2mbox. This utility
> requires an environment variable named:
>
> MAILTMP
>
> I don't know if this is a syst
I was messing around with backing up mail with my Qmail server, and
there is a utility that comes with it called, maildir2mbox. This utility
requires an environment variable named:
MAILTMP
I don't know if this is a system wide variable, or something just with
Qmail. Maybe this is a pointer, mayb
I am not sure whether I am doing something the right way, but I have
come up against a wall. In the attach menu after saving the message, I
want to modify the message considerably by piping it to a script. The
modifications are such that they can not be done in situ. I have to
create another tempo
17 matches
Mail list logo
