Mutt+Cygwin [Re: M$ dog]

2000-09-01 Thread Ulf Erikson
> > It boils down to mutt's UNIX-like behavior of expecting other pieces to > > be there; all mutt does is read mail, and it sucks less at that than > > anything else. The biggest problem people often quote is the lack of > > an MTA, since mutt does not talk directly to the MDA on the recipient >

Re: M$ dog

2000-07-25 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 10:18:25PM -0400, David T-G wrote: > % Since I must, I use win2k at work. I've found PC-Pine to be a marginally > > I hear TheBAT! is pretty good, BTW. (Yes, but I would trade it for Mutt any minute...) > % acceptable mailer, but I'd love to use mutt. I've found nothing

Re: M$ dog

2000-07-18 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Michael Soulier proclaimed on mutt-users that: >Heh... I'm on a UNIX workstation while a lot of people around me are on NT >running LookOut. They get so annoyed when their proprietary M$ RTF messages >don't look snazzy when they get to me. I also laughed my ass off when they all >went down du

Re: M$ dog

2000-07-18 Thread Michael Soulier
On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 10:18:25PM -0400, David T-G wrote: > Bring in your *NIX laptop instead :-) With mutt's IMAP support, you can > even talk to the MS Exchange server and not have to use LookOut! like the > rest of your coworkers! Heh... I'm on a UNIX workstation while a lot of people a

Re: M$ dog

2000-07-18 Thread Todd Goodman
* John Saylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000717 21:50]: > Has anyone done anything about porting mutt to the windows world? Someone has reportedly ported mutt and sendmail to Cygwin (see http://sourceware.cygnus.com/cygwin). Check out http://www.fiction.net/blong/programs/mutt/ for the mutt patch. I

Re: M$ dog

2000-07-18 Thread cgreen
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 11:08:31AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > David T-G proclaimed on mutt-users that: > > Correct - but there are several tiny m$-dog based servers like Mercury/32 > (the latest version of which has an esmtp module). You can set mercury to > s

Re: M$ dog

2000-07-17 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
utt does not talk directly to the MDA on the recipient >machine via SMTP port 25, as I believe PINE does. It doesn't help that Correct - but there are several tiny m$-dog based servers like Mercury/32 (the latest version of which has an esmtp module). You can set mercury to smarthost (relay) th

Re: M$ dog

2000-07-17 Thread David T-G
John -- ...and then John Saylor said... % Hi % % Don't flame me- if it was up to me I'd never turn on that god forsaken % OS that continues to increase shareholder wealth. *grin* Better watch it anyway; this is a rife field :-) % % Since I must, I use win2k at work. I've found PC-Pine to be

M$ dog

2000-07-17 Thread John Saylor
Hi Don't flame me- if it was up to me I'd never turn on that god forsaken OS that continues to increase shareholder wealth. Since I must, I use win2k at work. I've found PC-Pine to be a marginally acceptable mailer, but I'd love to use mutt. I've found nothing on the web about this. My guess is