it is said that apt-get dont get the postfix right, SASL.
indeed even i can i send mail through postfix, yet with strange suffix
domain. =,=n
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Erik Christiansen
wrote:
> An apt-get update, followed by an apt-get install postfix (with the
> need to answer a que
On 25.08.11 09:37, source liu wrote:
> Maybe I should try something like sendmail/postfix, through it quit a
> big challenge after a take a glance at their manuals,
> great power requires greater efforts.
An apt-get update, followed by an apt-get install postfix (with the
need to answer a questio
Sorry, The error code i gave is not accuracy i'm afraid.
1. the Mutt gave out the error message of SASL authentication failed
**without** msmtp as its sender.
2. msmtp gave
mstp: GNU SASL: GSSAPI error in client while negotiating security
context in gss_init_sec_context() in SASL library. This i
so its a script of perl, got it.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Mason Loring Bliss wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 09:27:07AM +0800, source liu wrote:
>
>> of course the integrate addressbook will help a lot, i'm also interesting
>> in it.
>
> I'll attach the LDAP look-up script I use. I d
> set imap_keepalive=15
> set imap_passive=no
> set mail_check=15
> set ssl_use_sslv3=yes
> set timeout=15
>
> set imap_user=[your-short-username]
> set imap_pass=[your-password]
> set smtp_url="smtp://[your-user-name]@[your-mail-server]:587/"
> set smtp_pass=[your-password]
>
> set folder=imap://
> Two further notes... If you set biff notifications and have a typo in a
> mailbox name, you'll likely see a very misleading SSL error. Double-check
> your mailbox directives. Also, note that you can pretty easily integrate
> addressbook functionality via an LDAP command. If you get all this worki
sorry for the confusion of M$ instead of Microsoft, I saw it when i
come across Stallman's homepage and he refers to it as this way.
No offense, just thought it was interesting rather than rebuking of
making money. of course i would pay if i'm after the services their
provide me.
Thank you f
On 22Aug2011 14:31, Aaron Toponce wrote:
| On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 03:37:50PM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
| > On 2011-08-22, Aaron Toponce wrote:
| > > What is 'M$ exchange'? I've heard of Microsoft Exchange, but I'm
| > > unfamiliar with this 'M$' company to which you refer.
| >
| > You must be
On 2011-08-22, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 05:25:05PM +0800, source liu wrote:
>> I've recently picked up the path to the mutt + fetchmail + msmtp, and
>> it works well with my gmail or other serves provider.
>> For the issue my company use the M$ exchange as the mail server,
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 05:25:05PM +0800, source liu wrote:
> I've recently picked up the path to the mutt + fetchmail + msmtp, and it
> works well with my gmail or other serves provider. For the issue my company
> use the M$ exchange as the mail server, I have to fight my way to configure
> that.
Hi all,
I've recently picked up the path to the mutt + fetchmail + msmtp, and
it works well with my gmail or other serves provider.
For the issue my company use the M$ exchange as the mail server, I
have to fight my way to configure that. The case now is the fetchmail
works pretty well while it p
On 04/01/02 Ralf Hildebrandt did speaketh:
> Am 04.01.2002 um 16:14:18 +0100 schrieb Elimar Riesebieter folgendes:
>
> If they're paranoid, why do they use M$ products?
:) That's probably what made them paranoid.
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, GnuPG pub key: 5BC8BE08
"...th
On 04/01/02 Elimar Riesebieter did speaketh:
> How can I communicate with that Exchange box to get all my mails by
> mutt or fetch- and procmail?
> Smtp sending is no problem. I am using a thin postfixserver on my
> laptop, which sends the mails to mail.smtp.company!
I use Mutt at work with Exch
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 02:54:33PM +0100, René Clerc wrote:
>
> Am I missing the point? I'm no Exchange guru, but can't you just use
> pop, IMAP or fetchmail? Does Exchange honor the usual mail retrieval
> protocols?
They have to EXPLICITLY enable IMAP and/or POP3.
Outlook uses a proprietary pr
* Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-01-2002 16:16]:
| > Make sure the admins have enabled IMAP, and use mutt's IMAP
| > functions. Works fine.
| I'm not shure whether they do it! They are very paranoid and still
| only Oulook is enabled!
Well, check! You have to specify a mail server in
Am 04.01.2002 um 16:14:18 +0100 schrieb Elimar Riesebieter folgendes:
> > Make sure the admins have enabled IMAP, and use mutt's IMAP
> > functions. Works fine.
> I'm not shure whether they do it! They are very paranoid and still
> only Oulook is enabled!
If they're paranoid, why do they use M$
On Fri, 04 Jan 2002 the mental interface of Steve Kennedy told:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 02:45:42PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>
> > The company wide mailsystem is based on that product called
> > "M$-Exchange-Server", and I am not able to change the mind
* Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-01-2002 14:50]:
| I wish all of you a happy new year!
Same to you!
| How can I communicate with that Exchange box to get all my mails by
| mutt or fetch- and procmail?
Am I missing the point? I'm no Exchange guru, but can't you just use
pop, IMAP or
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 02:45:42PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> The company wide mailsystem is based on that product called
> "M$-Exchange-Server", and I am not able to change the mind of some
> admins to use a linux box instead!
> My question:
> How can I commu
"M$-Exchange-Server", and I am not able to change the mind of some
admins to use a linux box instead!
My question:
How can I communicate with that Exchange box to get all my mails by
mutt or fetch- and procmail?
Smtp sending is no problem. I am using a thin postfixserver on my
laptop, w
20 matches
Mail list logo
