Re: Lists and marks

2001-04-17 Thread Andre Berger
* Dave Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2001-04-17 10:22 +0200: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 12:22:14AM +0200, Andre Berger wrote: > > > Now, can I also flag such messages as important > > automatically? I guess the "push" command is made for such cases, a little > > example would help

Re: Lists and marks

2001-04-17 Thread Dave Pearson
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 12:22:14AM +0200, Andre Berger wrote: > Now, can I also flag such messages as important > automatically? I guess the "push" command is made for such cases, a little > example would help me very much. I'd have thought that using procmail to do this would b

Re: Lists and marks

2001-04-16 Thread Andre Berger
* Dave Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2001-04-16 22:22 +0200: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 06:37:03PM +0200, Andre Berger wrote: > > > It would be convenient to have replies to my own postings to lists > > (threads I've posted in) automatically marked. What filter criterium can > > be used in this cas

Re: Lists and marks

2001-04-16 Thread Dave Pearson
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 06:37:03PM +0200, Andre Berger wrote: > It would be convenient to have replies to my own postings to lists > (threads I've posted in) automatically marked. What filter criterium can > be used in this case? If, by "marked", you mean coloured in some way you can do it by se

Lists and marks

2001-04-16 Thread Andre Berger
It would be convenient to have replies to my own postings to lists (threads I've posted in) automatically marked. What filter criterium can be used in this case? Andre Berger[[EMAIL PROTECTED]] PGP signature