On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 10:44:46PM -0500, Rich Lafferty (dis)graced my inbox with:
> Those who saw it and thought "This last part wasn't signed! It must
> not be from Rich!" get brownie points. Those that didn't need to read
> their PGP manuals again :-)
Should we be worried that this entire mess
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 11:40:11AM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
> Cliff Sarginson wrote:
>
> > Mmm, oops.
> > I don't think [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a valid address,
> > so how comes I got it ? That was a rhetorical question, btw.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] == [EMAIL PROTECTED] - both addresses
> work (an
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 06:33:28PM +, Lars Hecking ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Bruno Postle writes:
> > On Sat 03-Nov-2001 at 11:06:16AM -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote:
> > >
> > > (In case you haven't already gone "D'oh!":)
> >
> > Am I the only person who got a huge windows virus tagged onto
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 13:13:46 -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Bruno --
>
> ...and then Bruno Postle said...
> %
> % Am I the only person who got a huge windows virus tagged onto the end of
> % that email?
>
> No; I got it, too (a 3060 line message is hard to miss). Interestingly
> enough, though,
Cliff Sarginson wrote:
> Mmm, oops.
> I don't think [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a valid address,
> so how comes I got it ? That was a rhetorical question, btw.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] == [EMAIL PROTECTED] - both addresses
work (and people tend to send to both).
just add both to your subscribe line and you'
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 05:47:44PM +, Bruno Postle wrote:
> On Sat 03-Nov-2001 at 11:06:16AM -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote:
> >
> > (In case you haven't already gone "D'oh!":)
>
> Am I the only person who got a huge windows virus tagged onto the end of
> that email?
>
> --
> Bruno
---end quot
Rob --
...and then Rob 'Feztaa' Park said...
% On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 11:44:15AM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park (dis)graced my inbox
with:
% > > Best of all, I wonder how it got on there; Rich used mutt to send the
% > > mail, not Outhouse...
% >
% > That User-Agent header could have been spoofed...
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 11:44:15AM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park (dis)graced my inbox with:
> > Best of all, I wonder how it got on there; Rich used mutt to send the
> > mail, not Outhouse...
>
> That User-Agent header could have been spoofed...
Before I stick my foot any farther into my mouth, I sh
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 06:27:58PM +, Bruno Postle (dis)graced my inbox with:
> On Sat 03-Nov-2001 at 10:56:51AM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
> > >
> > > Am I the only person who got a huge windows virus tagged onto the end of
> > > that email?
> >
> > All I saw was his PGP signature atta
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 01:13:46PM -0500, David T-G (dis)graced my inbox with:
> % On Sat 03-Nov-2001 at 11:06:16AM -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote:
> % >
> % > (In case you haven't already gone "D'oh!":)
> %
> % Am I the only person who got a huge windows virus tagged onto the end of
> % that email?
Bruno Postle writes:
> On Sat 03-Nov-2001 at 11:06:16AM -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote:
> >
> > (In case you haven't already gone "D'oh!":)
>
> Am I the only person who got a huge windows virus tagged onto the end of
> that email?
I never saw it because it was rejected on my mail gateway.
Yes, R
On Sat 03-Nov-2001 at 10:56:51AM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
> >
> > Am I the only person who got a huge windows virus tagged onto the end of
> > that email?
>
> All I saw was his PGP signature attached to that email. ;)
Strange, the email I got from gbnet.net _definitely_ had a big virus
a
Thus spake Rob 'Feztaa' Park ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Am I the only person who got a huge windows virus tagged onto the
> > end of that email?
>
> All I saw was his PGP signature attached to that email. ;)
I saw neither.
--
Justin R. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PGP/GnuPG Key ID 0xC9C40C31 (pre
Bruno --
...and then Bruno Postle said...
% On Sat 03-Nov-2001 at 11:06:16AM -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote:
% >
% > (In case you haven't already gone "D'oh!":)
%
% Am I the only person who got a huge windows virus tagged onto the end of
% that email?
No; I got it, too (a 3060 line message is hard
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 11:06:16AM -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 11:53:18AM +0100, Cliff Sarginson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>wrote:
> >
> > This messages is as seen in the list in one of the threads:
>
> [...]
>
> > Cc: "FreeBSD Questions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Next is
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 05:47:44PM +, Bruno Postle (dis)graced my inbox with:
> On Sat 03-Nov-2001 at 11:06:16AM -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote:
> >
> > (In case you haven't already gone "D'oh!":)
>
> Am I the only person who got a huge windows virus tagged onto the end of
> that email?
All I s
On Sat 03-Nov-2001 at 11:06:16AM -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote:
>
> (In case you haven't already gone "D'oh!":)
Am I the only person who got a huge windows virus tagged onto the end of
that email?
--
Bruno
Hello,
I am a little bit confused about how Mutt decides
something is part of one of your subscribed lists or
not. I have a number of subscribe lines in my rc, and
most of the time it works fine. Sometimes however
it does not, often in a thread, it seems to fail to recognise
particular messages a
18 matches
Mail list logo
