On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 01:21:50AM +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> Perhaps. I'm using 1.2. I don't remember when that was introduced.
in 1.1.11 it's also s and S ...
--
Christian Ordig | Homepage: http://thor.prohosting.com/~chrordig/
Germany |eMail: Chris
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 03:36:09PM -0400, Rob Reid wrote:
> > > I like the idea, but d is already used to indicate messages with deleted
> > > attachments. How about s?
> >
> > That's too already used for PGP signed but unverified messages. Maybe
> > `w' (written)?
>
> I only see (capital) S w
At 3:51 PM EDT on May 24 Marius Gedminas sent off:
> On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 01:50:29PM -0400, Rob Reid wrote:
> > At 2:34 PM EDT on May 24 Marius Gedminas sent off:
> > > I suggest adding a new status flag: `d' to indicate that the deletion of
> > > this message resulted from , , or
> > > .
> >
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 01:50:29PM -0400, Rob Reid wrote:
> At 2:34 PM EDT on May 24 Marius Gedminas sent off:
> > I suggest adding a new status flag: `d' to indicate that the deletion of
> > this message resulted from , , or
> > .
>
> I like the idea, but d is already used to indicate messages
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 08:34:24PM +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> I suggest adding a new status flag: `d' to indicate that the deletion of
> this message resulted from , , or
> .
>
> What do you think?
Sounds like a great idea to me. =)
- Myrddin
---
At 2:34 PM EDT on May 24 Marius Gedminas sent off:
> I suggest adding a new status flag: `d' to indicate that the deletion of
> this message resulted from , , or
> .
I like the idea, but d is already used to indicate messages with deleted
attachments. How about s?
--
coude tat: When the pers
Sometimes I look into the `D' flag in the index and cannot remember if I
have saved a message or deleted it. Besides, `s' and `d' are so close
on an QWERTY keyboard... And there's no way to find out. Generally I
then save it again, just to err on the safe side.
I suggest adding a new status fl
