On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 07:57:51AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> ...and then Ricardo SIGNES said...
> % My procmail rules use regexes to generate folder names on the fly!
>
> Hmmm... So have procmail generate the folder name and then hand it off
> to a script which checks a list to see if it's known
Ricardo --
...and then Ricardo SIGNES said...
%
% On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 11:00:50PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
...
% > % I don't like having to list all of my 50+ folders, to which procmail writes,
% > % just to have it tell me if there's new mail in them.
% > So whip up a little script that goes
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 11:00:50PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> % Is there a way to tell mutt to either:
> % a) use my IMAP subscriptions as my 'mailboxes' (to check for new mail)
> % b) tell mutt to consider all mailboxes as 'mailboxes'
> No, not really.
:-(
> % I don't like having to list all o
Ricardo --
...and then Ricardo SIGNES said...
%
% Hello!
Hi!
%
% Is there a way to tell mutt to either:
% a) use my IMAP subscriptions as my 'mailboxes' (to check for new mail)
% b) tell mutt to consider all mailboxes as 'mailboxes'
No, not really.
%
% I don't like having to list all o
Hello!
Is there a way to tell mutt to either:
a) use my IMAP subscriptions as my 'mailboxes' (to check for new mail)
b) tell mutt to consider all mailboxes as 'mailboxes'
I don't like having to list all of my 50+ folders, to which procmail writes,
just to have it tell me if there's new mail in
