On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 10:54:16PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello Christian Ebert,
>
> Am 2010-08-05 15:45:48, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> > As Erik is using Maildir even that wouldn't help much as the
> > messages would be delivered to /new/ .
>
> And if he had looked into the arch
Hello Yue Wu,
Am 2010-08-05 21:18:45, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> for j in $(find $2 -type d | grep cur) ; do (
> cd $j ;
> for i in * ;
> do cat $i | formail -ds procmail ;
> done) ;
> done
>
> But after redeliverd, all emails
Hello Christian Ebert,
Am 2010-08-05 15:45:48, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> As Erik is using Maildir even that wouldn't help much as the
> messages would be delivered to /new/ .
And if he had looked into the archive of the list, he would
know how to make files read. Including modifying the
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 10:48:05AM +0800, Yue Wu wrote:
In my case, after re-procmail, every email will be unread, I can't recorgnize
which are those I've read, I have to look those emails one by one and recall
if it's really read or unread by me.
In the script or procmail recipe that refiles t
Hi Yue,
* Yue Wu [06. Aug. 2010]:
> On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 03:45:48PM +0100, Christian Ebert wrote:
>> * Erik Christiansen on Friday, August 06, 2010 at 00:38:37 +1000
>>> On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 09:18:45PM +0800, Yue Wu wrote:
>> >> I don't only want to redeliver my emails, but also not let all
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 10:51:28PM -0300, Monte Stevens wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 08:34:01AM +0800, Yue Wu wrote:
> > Orgnizing all mails to be unread then mark the old ones to be read is
> > very tedious if mails is many.
>
> Really?
>
> How about T ~N ;N ?
>
> Or in long form:
>
> patt
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 08:34:01AM +0800, Yue Wu wrote:
> Orgnizing all mails to be unread then mark the old ones to be read is
> very tedious if mails is many.
Really?
How about T ~N ;N ?
Or in long form:
pattern = new messages = ~N
Optionally use ~O for old messages.
--
Monte
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 03:45:48PM +0100, Christian Ebert wrote:
> * Erik Christiansen on Friday, August 06, 2010 at 00:38:37 +1000
> > On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 09:18:45PM +0800, Yue Wu wrote:
> >> I don't only want to redeliver my emails, but also not let all redelivered
> >> mails become into the
* Erik Christiansen on Friday, August 06, 2010 at 00:38:37 +1000
> On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 09:18:45PM +0800, Yue Wu wrote:
>> I don't only want to redeliver my emails, but also not let all redelivered
>> mails become into the unread status. I'm using maildir format, and tried with
>> the following
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 09:18:45PM +0800, Yue Wu wrote:
> I don't only want to redeliver my emails, but also not let all redelivered
> mails become into the unread status. I'm using maildir format, and tried with
> the following script:
>
> for j in $(find $2 -type d | grep cur) ; do (
>
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 08:50:22AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Yue Wu [08-05-10 08:39]:
> > Sometimes I want to filter my emails with new rule of procmail, archived
> > list has the way to re-procmail, but all re-procmailed mails will be at
> > the new unread status. My question is, how to
* Yue Wu [08-05-10 08:39]:
> Sometimes I want to filter my emails with new rule of procmail, archived
> list has the way to re-procmail, but all re-procmailed mails will be at
> the new unread status. My question is, how to re-procmail without
> changing the read/unread status of emails?
You don
Hi list,
Sometimes I want to filter my emails with new rule of procmail, archived list
has the way to re-procmail, but all re-procmailed mails will be at the new
unread status. My question is, how to re-procmail without changing the
read/unread status of emails?
--
Regards,
Yue Wu
Key Laborator
13 matches
Mail list logo
