Hi,
* Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi!
>
> * Jerome De Greef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-18 08:18]:
> > > send-hook "! ." 'my_hdr From: JDG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
> > > try again. does it work now?
> > Nope...
>
> send-hook " ~t ." 'my_hdr From: JDG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
> s
* Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> * Jerome De Greef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-16 14:11]:
> > > > BTW, doesn't ..* do the same as .+ ?
> > > "it depends". really - it all depends on
> > > the language you currently have available.
> > I was talking about Mutt ;)
>
> So was I. more sp
* Jerome De Greef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-16 14:11]:
> > > BTW, doesn't ..* do the same as .+ ?
> > "it depends". really - it all depends on
> > the language you currently have available.
> I was talking about Mutt ;)
So was I. more specifically, I was talking about
the "regular expression
* Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> * Jerome De Greef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-16 09:25]:
> > > % send-hook '~t .*' 'my_hdr From: JDG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
> > > % send-hook !'~t .*' 'my_hdr From: JDG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
> > > Does this work, or do you think it should?
> > > I'd expect
* Jerome De Greef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-16 09:25]:
> > % send-hook '~t .*' 'my_hdr From: JDG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
> > % send-hook !'~t .*' 'my_hdr From: JDG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
> > Does this work, or do you think it should?
> > I'd expect that you'd need "..*" in your
> > patterns instead