Re: Help on save-hook please

2000-07-01 Thread Rino Mardo
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 03:36:56PM +0300 or thereabouts, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > Richard Curnow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 30 Jun 2000: > > Is mbox-hook what you're after? > > Yes, that's what I meant. I thought I *knew* there was a way to do it, > just forgot what it was. Then got confu

Re: Help on save-hook please

2000-06-30 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Richard Curnow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 30 Jun 2000: > Is mbox-hook what you're after? Yes, that's what I meant. I thought I *knew* there was a way to do it, just forgot what it was. Then got confused by the $mbox explanation which doesn't talk about mbox-hook at all.. Maybe I should

Re: Help on save-hook please

2000-06-30 Thread Richard Curnow
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 02:05:40PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 30 Jun 2000: > > > Reading the documentation on $move and $mbox, it turns out that this > feature is only enabled for the spool mailbox, so apparently you can't > use it to auto-

Re: Help on save-hook please

2000-06-30 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 30 Jun 2000: > Oops, what I meant is probably something like this: > > folder-hook . set record='+read' Another oops. I wonder how come nobody else caught this yet and corrected me? :-) Anyway, I shouldn't be talking about $record, I mean $mbo

Re: Help on save-hook please

2000-06-29 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Rino Mardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 30 Jun 2000: > Hmm, that could be the reason why I'm getting a repetition operand invalid. Yes. :-) * means "any number (0 or more) of the character just before", so using * alone doesn't make sense, as there is no character just before it. * works a

Re: Help on save-hook please

2000-06-29 Thread Rino Mardo
On Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 11:33:33PM +0300 or thereabouts, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > > > folder-hook . save-hook * =received > > The * should be a . instead, like this: > > folder-hook . save-hook . =received Hmm, that could be the reason why I'm getting a repetition operand invalid. > > But

Re: Help on save-hook please

2000-06-29 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Rino Mardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 28 Jun 2000: > My problem is with the the save-hook as I want to be > able to save read messages to, let's say, a "Mail\read.mutt" file. Do you want to save read messages automatically when you exit a folder, or do you want to specify the default folde

Help on save-hook please

2000-06-29 Thread Rino Mardo
Hi. I've been running mutt for several days now and also managed to setup my own procmail recipes. My problem is with the the save-hook as I want to be able to save read messages to, let's say, a "Mail\read.mutt" file. This is my present ~/.muttrc contents for the save-hook: folder-hook . set