Re: Help about hidden destination

2000-03-29 Thread Fabrice Planchon
On Thu Mar 16 2000 at 12:39:25PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote: > > Actually, Mutt is in a unique position here, to be able to specify > sender addresses to sendmail without putting those names into the > headers. That is, Mutt could easily feed sendmail a message with a > "To: undisclosed-recipie

Re: Help about hidden destination

2000-03-16 Thread David DeSimone
Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is not true. Try using the bcc header, and set nowrite_bcc. Hmm, the manual doesn't make this function clear to me. It says: write_bcc Controls whether mutt writes out the Bcc header when preparing messages to be sent. Exim us

Re: Help about hidden destination

2000-03-16 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 2000-03-16 12:39:25 -0600, David DeSimone wrote: > But there is no code to do this in Mutt currently. This is not true. Try using the bcc header, and set nowrite_bcc. -- http://www.guug.de/~roessler/

Re: Help about hidden destination

2000-03-16 Thread David DeSimone
Bennett Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So in that case, I suppose the original question could be answered > really sadistically, with "compose the message, then postpone it, then > change to the postponed folder, then select the message, then > repeatedly bounce it by hand to each of the reci

Re: Help about hidden destination

2000-03-16 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 2000-03-16 17:20:58 +, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote: > Apparently it is guarranteed that recipients in the To > and Cc fields will not receive the Bcc field, but it is > not guarranteed that recipients in the Bcc field will > not receive the Bcc field. This is a non-issue nowadays: You can

Re: Help about hidden destination

2000-03-16 Thread Bennett Todd
2000-03-16-12:20:58 Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS: > I have been told that this is in fact a common abuse of Bcc. > Apparently it is guarranteed that recipients in the To and Cc > fields will not receive the Bcc field, but it is not guarranteed > that recipients in the Bcc field will not receive the Bcc fi

Re: Help about hidden destination

2000-03-16 Thread Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Bennett Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > maybe it's a stupid question asked hundred times already, but > > it would really help if you can tell me how hiding the names of > > all the people I send a mail, to avoid someone of them answering > > everybody. > > The feature you're talking about is call

Re: Help about hidden destination

2000-03-16 Thread Bennett Todd
2000-03-16-11:08:54 Laurent Marsan: > maybe it's a stupid question asked hundred times already, but > it would really help if you can tell me how hiding the names of > all the people I send a mail, to avoid someone of them answering > everybody. The feature you're talking about is called blind ca

Help about hidden destination

2000-03-16 Thread Laurent Marsan
Hi, maybe it's a stupid question asked hundred times already, but it would really help if you can tell me how hiding the names of all the people I send a mail, to avoid someone of them answering everybody. Thanks a lot, Laurent