On 1999-05-29 09:39:45 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> Using ~b, ~h, or ~B in an fcc or fcc-save-hook will crash any
> current mutt.
Not completely correct. It's only in an fcc-save-hook.
--- .bak/hook.c Thu May 27 13:10:46 1999
+++ hook.c Sat May 29 10:14:08 1999
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/*
-
On 1999-05-28 18:31:37 -0400, David Shaw wrote:
> I just sent a post to mutt-dev about what seems to be a similar
> problem. It seems to core when a fcc-save-hook matches using "~h".
Using ~b, ~h, or ~B in an fcc or fcc-save-hook will crash any
current mutt.
The problem is essentially that msg_
On Fri, May 28, 1999 at 06:27:45PM -0400, Petr Hlustik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> About two months ago I posted a message about Mutt crash (seg fault) when
> composing a message, after return from editor. The reason for crash was a
> bad fcc-send-hook that was meant to be just a save-hook:
>
> fcc-save
Hello,
About two months ago I posted a message about Mutt crash (seg fault) when
composing a message, after return from editor. The reason for crash was a
bad fcc-send-hook that was meant to be just a save-hook:
fcc-save-hook '~h "Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"' +dosemu
Well, I have finally been ab
