On Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 07:27:36PM +0200, Morten Brix Pedersen wrote:
> Users usually won't understand whats happening when you 'bounce' a mail
> to them, because it looks like its the original author who sent the
> e-mail.
>
> So, is there a "better" way forwarding e-mail with attachments?
I wo
Thus spake peter horst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Is there a way to alter that formula so that it asks to mime_forward
> all mails with "multipart" in the headers except mails marked
> "multipart/signed"?
I would think that you could do this:
message-hook . "set mime_forward=no"
mes
On Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 09:28:59PM -0500, peter horst wrote:
> On Aug 5, 13:58PM, Justin R. Miller wrote:
> > Thus spake Morten Brix Pedersen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >
> > > So, is there a "better" way forwarding e-mail with attachments?
> >
> > Here's what I use:
> >
> > message-hook . "se
On Aug 5, 13:58PM, Justin R. Miller wrote:
> Thus spake Morten Brix Pedersen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > So, is there a "better" way forwarding e-mail with attachments?
>
> Here's what I use:
>
> message-hook . "set mime_forward=no"
> message-hook "~h multipart" "set mime_forward=as
On Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 01:58:22PM -0400, Justin R. Miller wrote:
> > So, is there a "better" way forwarding e-mail with attachments?
>
> Here's what I use:
>
> message-hook . "set mime_forward=no"
> message-hook "~h multipart" "set mime_forward=ask-yes"
>
>[...]
>
> That what you'
Thus spake Morten Brix Pedersen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> So, is there a "better" way forwarding e-mail with attachments?
Here's what I use:
message-hook . "set mime_forward=no"
message-hook "~h multipart" "set mime_forward=ask-yes"
By default, all messages will be forwared inlin
Yes, I know the manual says that you should use 'bounce'. But isn't
there a better way?
Users usually won't understand whats happening when you 'bounce' a mail
to them, because it looks like its the original author who sent the
e-mail.
So, is there a "better" way forwarding e-mail with attachmen
