-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, May 12 at 03:41 AM, quoth Raffi Khatchadourian:
> I have a question relating to this one. I've recently switched from mbox
> to maildir and I've noticed that, while the performance seems better,
> the amount of exposed message headers has
Am 2007-05-09 21:40:23, schrieb Cleverson:
> I've just installed Gentoo Linux and now I intend to setup a mail system
> with Mutt. My CPU is an AMD Sempron 1500 mhz, 256 RAM. My filesystem is
> ReiserFS 3.6.
> Is it true that Maildir has better performance while loading folders? And
Yes. And i
I have a question relating to this one. I've recently switched from mbox
to maildir and I've noticed that, while the performance seems better,
the amount of exposed message headers has drastically increased. Any
idea why and how to get it back to the mbox normal amount?
On Wed 9.May'07 at 21:40:
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 09:40:23PM -0300, Cleverson wrote:
> with Mutt. My CPU is an AMD Sempron 1500 mhz, 256 RAM. My filesystem is
> ReiserFS 3.6.
I like Maildir.
try changing the reiserFS mount opts, specially noatime and nodiratime.
It made accessing my mailbox a bit faster, and check out too
0n Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:03:38PM -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
>On Thursday, May 10 at 07:48 PM, quoth Cleverson:
>> Thank you very much for all of infos. I have yet another question:
>> Whatever format I choose, is it easy to convert the folders to the other
>> one in case I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, May 10 at 07:48 PM, quoth Cleverson:
> Thank you very much for all of infos. I have yet another question:
> Whatever format I choose, is it easy to convert the folders to the other
> one in case I want to give it a try?
It depends. Conve
Hello Kyle and all,
Thank you very much for all of infos. I have yet another question:
Whatever format I choose, is it easy to convert the folders to the other one
in case I want to give it a try?
Cheers,
Cleverson
"Be realistic; ask for the impossible."
Kyle wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED ME
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, May 9 at 09:40 PM, quoth Cleverson:
> I've just installed Gentoo Linux and now I intend to setup a mail
> system with Mutt. My CPU is an AMD Sempron 1500 mhz, 256 RAM. My
> filesystem is ReiserFS 3.6.
Well, ReiserFS is particularly we
Hi all
I've read about Mbox and Maildir at the Mutt wiki. I'd apreciate more
personal opinions on which format could be better for my case in particular:
I've just installed Gentoo Linux and now I intend to setup a mail system
with Mutt. My CPU is an AMD Sempron 1500 mhz, 256 RAM. My filesyst
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Nick Croft wrote:
> Mutt Users,
> I'm trying to get a uniform look and feel to mutt on 3 machines, all running
> Debian. Version is 1.3.25i.
> The folder_format is set to the standard
> "%F %-8.8u %-8.8g %d %8s %N %f"
> on all three machines, yet the %N value only shows u
Mutt Users,
I'm trying to get a uniform look and feel to mutt on 3 machines, all running
Debian. Version is 1.3.25i.
The folder_format is set to the standard
"%F %-8.8u %-8.8g %d %8s %N %f"
on all three machines, yet the %N value only shows up on one of them
when I do c ? to the see the folder
Lance,
I saw that you got a reply to this second question, any reply to
the first?
steven
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 06:18:01AM -0500, Lance Hoffmeyer wrote:
>I am playing around with setting up my folder_index for an imap server.
>
>Is there a varable that will tell me how may messages are in
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 06:18:01AM -0500, Lance Hoffmeyer wrote:
> Also, Whenever I type "c"-"?" I always have to hit tab to get a good list
> of folders. Is there a way to set this folder display automatically?
> It seems like I remember doing that once before.
set up a macro that does the thr
I am playing around with setting up my folder_index for an imap server.
Is there a varable that will tell me how may messages are in the folder?
set folder_format="%???" The normal flags do not seem to work on imap?
Also, Whenever I type "c"-"?" I always have to hit tab to get a good list
of fo
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 06:25:33PM -0500, Hall Stevenson wrote:
> * Olaf Schulz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010902 17:30]:
> > Do you have any biff-like software running?
>
> The only thing possibly similar is gnome's 'Mail check Applet". I have
> no problem turning it off for testing purposes. There...
* Olaf Schulz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010902 17:30]:
> On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 02:47:24PM -0500, Hall Stevenson wrote:
> > Can anyone help me with setting up my 'set folder_format'
> > setting so that it tags folders that have new mail with
> > an 'N". I'm looking for something similar to this:
> > h
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 02:47:24PM -0500, Hall Stevenson wrote:
> Can anyone help me with setting up my 'set folder_format' setting so
> that it tags folders that have new mail with an 'N". I'm looking for
> something similar to this:
> http://www.linuxbrit.co.uk/mutt/mutt_directory.png. The exact
Can anyone help me with setting up my 'set folder_format' setting so
that it tags folders that have new mail with an 'N". I'm looking for
something similar to this:
http://www.linuxbrit.co.uk/mutt/mutt_directory.png. The exact setup
doesn't have to be the same though. As I said, I'm mainly interes
Waldemar --
...and then Waldemar Brodkorb said...
% Hello Muttusers,
Hello!
%
% What are the advantages/disadvantages of the different types of
% Mailboxes/Maildirs? Where could I read something about this?
You can see quite a bit of conversation in the mailing list archives;
this comes up
* Le 19 Sep >Mike McNally< ecrivait:
> Now the format problem... So I hit c ? and it displays the contents of
> ~/Mail as a regular directory display (like ls -l would). I want mutt
> to display the number of msgs in ea dir and maybe how many are
> read/unread in ea dir. But instead I get a di
Hello Muttusers,
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 12:50:41AM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
> Mike McNally muttered:
> > I have procmail sorting my mail into various dirs in ~/Mail. Each
> > message has a name like msg.BvJC, msg.gvJC. I had thought that setting
> > mbox_type=Maildir would clue mutt into
Mike McNally muttered:
> I'm a new mutt user starting right in with a pretty advanced
> configuration, but I've read a lot, so it's time to ask questions.
Welcome!
> I have procmail sorting my mail into various dirs in ~/Mail. Each
> message has a name like msg.BvJC, msg.gvJC. I had thought t
Mike --
...and then Mike McNally said...
% I'm a new mutt user starting right in with a pretty advanced
% configuration, but I've read a lot, so it's time to ask questions.
Welcome!
%
% I have procmail sorting my mail into various dirs in ~/Mail. Each
Yep... Are you dropping things into yo
Peter --
...and then Peter Jaques said...
% I have the same problem with a twist: procmail sorts my mail; when i see
% the browser list of mailboxes, my "mutt" mailbox shows "N" for new mail,
% but another mbox (which also has new mail, also placed there by procmail)
% does not... very strange, n
I'm a new mutt user starting right in with a pretty advanced
configuration, but I've read a lot, so it's time to ask questions.
I have procmail sorting my mail into various dirs in ~/Mail. Each
message has a name like msg.BvJC, msg.gvJC. I had thought that setting
mbox_type=Maildir would clue m
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 02:44:05PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Bruce DeVisser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 19 Sep 2000:
> > I have the same problem Anthony describes. There is clearly new mail
> > (checked via ls -l ; ls -lc ; ls -lu), but mutt is not picking up on
> > it for some reason.
msg.pgp
Anthony --
...and then Anthony Liu said...
% On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 05:40:43PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
%
% > % but I can't see the "N" indicator in the folder index even though some
% > % of the mailboxes has new mail (it is always blank). Why?
% >
% > If your folder_format is correct, then
On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 05:40:43PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> % 1) I have
> % set folder_format="%N %30s %f"
> % but I can't see the "N" indicator in the folder index even though some
> % of the mailboxes has new mail (it is always blank). Why?
>
> If your folder_format is correct, then you
Bruce DeVisser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 19 Sep 2000:
> I have the same problem Anthony describes. There is clearly new mail
> (checked via ls -l ; ls -lc ; ls -lu), but mutt is not picking up on
> it for some reason.
That's interesting. Is NFS involved? And this *is* with mbox style
fo
On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 05:40:43PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> ...and then Anthony Liu said...
[snip]
> %
> % I have a few questions below:
> %
> % 1) I have
> % set folder_format="%N %30s %f"
> % but I can't see the "N" indicator in the folder index even though
> % some of the mailboxes h
Anthony --
...and then Anthony Liu said...
%
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% I have a few questions below:
%
% 1) I have
% set folder_format="%N %30s %f"
% but I can't see the "N" indicator in the folder index even though some
% of the mailboxes has new mail (it is always blank). Why?
If your f
Hi,
I have a few questions below:
1) I have
set folder_format="%N %30s %f"
but I can't see the "N" indicator in the folder index even though some
of the mailboxes has new mail (it is always blank). Why?
2) Is it possible to do something like (new messages/old messages)
in the fold
Hi,
I have a few questions below:
1) I have
set folder_format="%N %30s %f"
but I can't see the "N" indicator in the folder index even though some
of the mailboxes has new mail (it is always blank). Why?
2) Is it possible to do something like (new messages/old messages)
in the folder index? Fo
34 matches
Mail list logo
