Re: Fix References of Received Mails

2000-11-22 Thread Martin Trautmann
-- resent On Tue 2000-11-21 (14:03), Martin Trautmann wrote: > Here's an extra wish: > > + Tag the thread

Re: Fix References of Received Mails

2000-11-22 Thread Martin Trautmann
-- resent On Thu 2000-11-16 (21:14), Martin Trautmann wrote: > On Thu 2000-11-16 (18:10), Ulf Erikson wrote: > > I use a macro to do just this. except for the extra 'fixed' header, but > > you should be able to add that one easily. All the tricks are in formail > > and the fairly new command,

Re: Fix References of Received Mails

2000-11-22 Thread Martin Trautmann
On Tue 2000-11-21 (14:03), Martin Trautmann wrote: > Here's an extra wish: > > + Tag the thread > + change the thread to read: <;w>N > > How should this be done? At least, after figuring out the general availability both of 2.3.4. Miscellaneous Functions and 6.4 Functions I managed to ins

Re: Fix References of Received Mails

2000-11-21 Thread Martin Trautmann
On Thu 2000-11-16 (21:14), Martin Trautmann wrote: > On Thu 2000-11-16 (18:10), Ulf Erikson wrote: > > I use a macro to do just this. except for the extra 'fixed' header, but > > you should be able to add that one easily. All the tricks are in formail > > and the fairly new command, which lets

Re: Fix References of Received Mails

2000-11-16 Thread Martin Trautmann
On Thu 2000-11-16 (18:10), Ulf Erikson wrote: > I use a macro to do just this. except for the extra 'fixed' header, but > you should be able to add that one easily. All the tricks are in formail > and the fairly new command, which lets you edit the raw message. > Not sure what version is need

Re: Fix References of Received Mails

2000-11-16 Thread Lars Hecking
> #-- > macro index ,T "\ > formail -x Message-ID > /tmp/mutt-msgID\ > set editor=\ > 'cat %s |\ > formail -i \"References:\ > \`cat /tmp/mutt-msgID;\ >cat %s | formail -x References\`\"\ Some luser mailers use both References: and In-Reply-To:. Fixing just one of them has no effect in s

Re: Fix References of Received Mails

2000-11-16 Thread Ulf Erikson
Quoting Martin Trautmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from 2000-11-16 10:48 +0100: > is there any chance to edit the headers of received mails semi-automatically? > > My wish is a macro to fix threading from other users with poor email > software. A macro shall be called with the list number of the proper

Re: Fix References of Received Mails

2000-11-16 Thread Martin Trautmann
On Thu 2000-11-16 (16:07), Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > Martin Trautmann proclaimed on mutt-users that: > > > is there any chance to edit the headers of received mails semi-automatically? > > procmail and formail are your friends. Thanks - this may be helpful to do it fully automatically,

Re: Fix References of Received Mails

2000-11-16 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Martin Trautmann proclaimed on mutt-users that: > is there any chance to edit the headers of received mails semi-automatically? procmail and formail are your friends. -suresh -- Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis mallet @ cluestick.org + Lumber Cartel of India

Fix References of Received Mails

2000-11-16 Thread Martin Trautmann
Hi all, is there any chance to edit the headers of received mails semi-automatically? My wish is a macro to fix threading from other users with poor email software. A macro shall be called with the list number of the proper referred email. This will copy the message id from there and insert it