Hi.
Just minor addition, else, I think this has been discussed quite
thourougly now.
On Sat 2002-07-06 at 11:07:53 +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> * Benjamin Pflugmann [02-07-05 23:56:08 +0200] wrote:
> > On Fri 2002-07-05 at 01:36:52 +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> > > I misunderstood him (completely)
Hi,
* Benjamin Pflugmann [02-07-05 23:56:08 +0200] wrote:
> On Fri 2002-07-05 at 01:36:52 +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> > * Benjamin Pflugmann [02-07-05 00:44:50 +0200] wrote:
> [...]
> > I misunderstood him (completely) but one may specify a
> > limit pattern to show only the mails of one
> > cor
Hi.
On Fri 2002-07-05 at 01:36:52 +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> * Benjamin Pflugmann [02-07-05 00:44:50 +0200] wrote:
[...]
> I misunderstood him (completely) but one may specify a limit
> pattern to show only the mails of one correspondence.
How?
> > I do not think so. The work to do would not b
Hi,
* Charles Jie [02-07-02 21:32:56 +0200] wrote:
> Is it possible to have a "cross-mbox-threading" function
> as following:
> 1. A variable, say ref-mboxes (Type: string, default:
>"=mbox:=outbox"), to specify related mboxes to
>reference. The mailbox in front of ':' is the main (or
>
Hi,
Situation:
I usually have to switch between =mbox and =outbox to check the mails on
a specific topic we've gone on for a while. Sometimes, another one, say
=work/project-A, needs to get involved, too.
The same case happens among =mbox.mutt, =outbox, and =mlist/mutt for my
daily life. (=mbox
