On 8/26/07, Nicolas Rachinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think shortly after ~= was introduced it worked only while the
> folder was sorted by threads. So perhaps t might help if you sort by
> threads first.
This one works. Thanks.
* Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-25 20:58 +1000]:
> I read the previous posts and tried in my inbox - press D, use ~= as
> the search pattern, press $ to save. But nothing happens. ~= doesn't
> tag anything and so nothing gets deleted. I am sure I have duplicate
>
to get mails, procmail(1) filters them before they
> land on my inbox or in their specific mboxes. I'm using Mutt v1.5.12
> on OpenBSD4.1
To remove duplicate mails w/procmail:
# ---
# remove duplicates ## from man
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 08:58:45PM +1000, Chris wrote:
> I read the previous posts and tried in my inbox - press D, use ~= as
> the search pattern, press $ to save. But nothing happens. ~= doesn't
> tag anything and so nothing gets deleted. I am sure I have duplicate
> mails
I read the previous posts and tried in my inbox - press D, use ~= as
the search pattern, press $ to save. But nothing happens. ~= doesn't
tag anything and so nothing gets deleted. I am sure I have duplicate
mails in my inbox as I downloaded each mail 2~3 times.
I use fetchmail(1) to get
On Thu, Feb 04, 1999 at 01:26:10AM -0800, Daniel Eisenbud
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is generally a good idea, but I just wanted to caution people that
> if someone sends you mail from a broken mailer that generates the same
> message-id more than once, this will throw away legitimate mail
On Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 10:27:43PM -0500, rfi from Rich Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Just a note:
> If you didn't have formail -D in your .procmailrc file
>
> To clear the dups try:
> ls -l mutt-l
> formail -q- -D 8192 id-cache mutt-fixed
> mv mutt-
Thank you. JFWIW, I found the attached snippet from some documention I
got a while ago from: ftp://cs.uta.fi/pub/ssjaaa/pm-tips.html
Incidentially, I see this documentation is actually maintained by J. Alto
but the recipes herein pertaining to duplicates seem simpler.
rfi from Rich Roth ([EMA
Just a note:
If you didn't have formail -D in your .procmailrc file
To clear the dups try:
ls -l mutt-l
formail -q- -D 8192 id-cache mutt-fixed
mv mutt-fixed mutt-l
# make sure to set the owners right
cho
Vikas Agnihotri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) skrev:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 07:54:37PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Vikas Agnihotri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) skrev:
>
> > > Ack. I didnt realize it since I de-dupe all my incoming mails using
> > > 'formail -D'. But I just went to my =dupes folder and
Vikas Agnihotri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) skrev:
> Ack. I didnt realize it since I de-dupe all my incoming mails using
> 'formail -D'. But I just went to my =dupes folder and sure enough,
> there were a ton of mutt-users mails.
Interesting. Just how do you do this...is it a procmail recipe and if so
On Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 01:27:06PM +, Lars Hecking wrote:
>
> Is it just me, or has anyone else received all mails from
> mutt-users twice since yesterday? As this only happens with
> mutt-users, I don't think it's a lcoal problem.
Me2
--
Moritz Moeller-Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN 3585
On Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 09:01:26AM -0800, Claus Assmann wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 1999, Lars Hecking wrote:
> > Is it just me, or has anyone else received all mails from
> > mutt-users twice since yesterday? As this only happens with
> > mutt-users, I don't think it's a lcoal problem.
> The pro
On Wed, Feb 03, 1999, Lars Hecking wrote:
>
> Is it just me, or has anyone else received all mails from
> mutt-users twice since yesterday? As this only happens with
> mutt-users, I don't think it's a lcoal problem.
The problem was/is at rpi.edu where a user made a mistake. If you
take a loo
Referring to Lars Hecking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Feb 03, 1999:
| Is it just me, or has anyone else received all mails from
| mutt-users twice since yesterday? As this only happens with
| mutt-users, I don't think it's a lcoal problem.
I experience the same here. Lots of duplicate messages,
ro
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=J5MfuwkIyy7RmF4Q; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Is it just me, or has anyone else received all mails from
mutt-users twice since yesterday? As this only happens with
mutt-users, I don't think it's a lcoal problem.
17 matches
Mail list logo
