Re: Disabling Shell Command function

2002-03-11 Thread Michael Tatge
Devin Brown muttered: > I'm a sysadmin of a Linux server in which users telnet (or ssh) into shells > using rbash so they can only execute progams I want them to execute. > right now the only E-Mail client I give them access to is Pine because Mutt > has a function where you can execute a shell c

Re: Disabling Shell Command function

2002-03-11 Thread Mike Schiraldi
Also, look into mount's "noexec" switch, or else users can mail themselves arbitrary binaries and then save them in the jail and run them. -- Mike Schiraldi VeriSign Applied Research msg25307/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Disabling Shell Command function

2002-03-11 Thread Mike Schiraldi
> Anyone know a way to do this? As has been pointed out, any plan that makes it impossible for a smart user to execute arbitrary programs from within mutt would also cripple mutt. Usually the right way to handle a situation like you describe is with the chroot command. It's a bit of a bother, si

Re: Disabling Shell Command function

2002-03-11 Thread David T-G
Devin, et al -- ...and then Devin Brown said... % % I'm a sysadmin of a Linux server in which users telnet (or ssh) into shells % using rbash so they can only execute progams I want them to execute. As of Interesting. % right now the only E-Mail client I give them access to is Pine because M

Disabling Shell Command function

2002-03-11 Thread Devin Brown
I'm a sysadmin of a Linux server in which users telnet (or ssh) into shells using rbash so they can only execute progams I want them to execute. As of right now the only E-Mail client I give them access to is Pine because Mutt has a function where you can execute a shell command. If the command