Re: Digital signature - .dat file in Outlook

Hi, sorry for the two mails, I started answering with mutt and instead of saving a draft and finishing this in Thunderbird, I sent it. Time for bed. ;-) > Yeah, it's evil because it's not the optimal solution but it works > reliably (enough). I wonder what enigmail does with mails like this: >

Re: Digital signature - .dat file in Outlook

Hi, > No, not yet. I tried a few times. *sigh* > Is there a public archive of the enigmail list? Reading up on the > subject could be fun I guess. Here: http://mozdev.org/pipermail/enigmail/ But it's nasty searching in it. I tried to find a good thread to show you with searching 'pgp/mime sit

Re: Digital signature - .dat file in Outlook

Hi, * Alexander Dahl wrote: > > PGP though that's strongly discouraged. It doesn't give you a pointless > > attachment but some pointless lines of text at top/bottom of your mail. > Did you ever try to explain this to the developers of Enigmail (GnuPG > extension for Mozilla Thunderbird)? No, n

Re: Digital signature - .dat file in Outlook

Hi, > PGP though that's strongly discouraged. It doesn't give you a pointless > attachment but some pointless lines of text at top/bottom of your mail. Did you ever try to explain this to the developers of Enigmail (GnuPG extension for Mozilla Thunderbird)? They have the contrary opinion. This to

Re: Digital signature - .dat file in Outlook

Good one! Will be waiting for 2007 version! :-) Best, Paul -Original Message- From: owner-mutt-us...@mutt.org [mailto:owner-mutt-us...@mutt.org] On Behalf Of Alexander Dahl Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 4:24 PM To: mutt-users@mutt.org Subject: Re: Digital signature - .dat file in

Re: Digital signature - .dat file in Outlook

Hi, > Does anyone know workaround for the problem with Outlook handling of the > digital signatures. (.dat file) Install a proper GnuPG plugin for Outlook? e.g. GpgOL: http://www.g10code.de/p-gpgol.html Greets Alex -- »With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the fi

Re: Digital signature - .dat file in Outlook

Hi, * Paul Grinberg wrote: > Btw, why does use of inline ("traditional") PGP strongly discouraged? There're many reasons, one of them that it's hard to detect reliably (i.e. it's horrible to code detection of nested traditional parts). With PGP/MIME you get reliable separation of different part

Re: Digital signature - .dat file in Outlook

org [mailto:owner-mutt-us...@mutt.org] On Behalf Of Rocco Rutte Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 12:10 PM To: mutt-users@mutt.org Subject: Re: Digital signature - .dat file in Outlook Hi, * Paul Grinberg wrote: > Does anyone know workaround for the problem with Outlook handling of > the dig

Re: Digital signature - .dat file in Outlook

-us...@mutt.org] On Behalf Of Rocco Rutte Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 12:10 PM To: mutt-users@mutt.org Subject: Re: Digital signature - .dat file in Outlook Hi, * Paul Grinberg wrote: > Does anyone know workaround for the problem with Outlook handling of > the digital signatures. (.dat

Re: Digital signature - .dat file in Outlook

Hi, * Paul Grinberg wrote: > Does anyone know workaround for the problem with Outlook handling of the > digital signatures. (.dat file) I think I once read something about an Outlook plugin that would support it. If that's not an option, you can try to send inline ("traditional") PGP though that

Digital signature - .dat file in Outlook

Hi, Does anyone know workaround for the problem with Outlook handling of the digital signatures. (.dat file) I read one post: http://www.lemis.com/grog/Rant/broken-MUA.php ... Not so promising... Any workaround? Thanks, Paul