On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 01:06:16PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
> i.e. the header lines of List-* are part of the DKIM signed lines.
> I can't change this, as the signing is done by the MTA of 1blu.de. I
> raised a ticket there, but without any
El día viernes, febrero 21, 2025 a las 01:21:02p. m. -0800,
googly.negotiator...@aceecat.org escribió:
...
> DNS stores the key, but if signing is done at all and which headers
> are covered is a config item for the MTA -- in my case, exim. When I wrote
> my reply to you I thought that back then
Sorry for the delay in replying. In light of yesterday's CVE
announcement I thought it might not be a good idea to advertise I'm
running exim until I patched it.
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 06:06:59PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > > This email has a DKIM signature on the List- headers of the email
Hi Matthias,
On 2025-02-21 13:28, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día jueves, febrero 20, 2025 a las 08:40:46a. m. -0800,
> googly.negotiator...@aceecat.org escribió:
>
> > > I've got a reject of an email to a public PostgreSQL mailing list
> > > due to an issue with my DKIM signature. Attached belo
El día jueves, febrero 20, 2025 a las 08:40:46a. m. -0800,
googly.negotiator...@aceecat.org escribió:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 10:50:52AM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
> > I've got a reject of an email to a public PostgreSQL mailing list
> > due to an issue with my DKIM signature. Attached bel
On Thu, 20 Feb 2025, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> I've got a reject of an email to a public PostgreSQL mailing list due to
> an issue with my DKIM signature. Attached below. I've sent a test email
> to my company mailbox to see my resulting DKIM signature. It's:
>
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 10:50:52AM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> I've got a reject of an email to a public PostgreSQL mailing list
> due to an issue with my DKIM signature. Attached below. I've sent a
> test email to my company mailbox to see my resulting DKIM
> signature. It's:
> What could be
Hi Matthias,
in most cases, the DKIM signature is applied by the mailserver, so mutt
is not involved. The relationship between DKIM signatures and mailing
lists is specified in RFC 6377[1], and it has always been rocky.
That said, I was not aware that a signature could forbid an email being
resen
Hello mutt-experts,
I've got a reject of an email to a public PostgreSQL mailing list due to
an issue with my DKIM signature. Attached below. I've sent a test email
to my company mailbox to see my resulting DKIM signature. It's:
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=u