Re: Best 'unstable' version for IMAP and how to build it

1999-09-22 Thread Lars Hecking
> > > Where can I get a mutt 0.96.xx with a ./configure with it? > > > > ftp://ftp.mutt.org/pub/mutt/devel/mutt-0.96.6i.tar.gz ? > > > Yes, that's where I have got to in the end! Phew! The snapshots > don't have ./configure with them but the devel tarballs do, how > confusing (well, to m

Re: Best 'unstable' version for IMAP and how to build it

1999-09-22 Thread Chris Green
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 05:38:30PM -0500, David DeSimone wrote: > Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > That's what I expected to be able to do but if you download the > > unstable snapshot there isn't a ./configure with it so you're stuffed! > > I don't download the snapshot. At least,

Re: Best 'unstable' version for IMAP and how to build it

1999-09-21 Thread David DeSimone
Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That's what I expected to be able to do but if you download the > unstable snapshot there isn't a ./configure with it so you're stuffed! I don't download the snapshot. At least, I don't think it's a snapshot. > Where can I get a mutt 0.96.xx with a ./c

Re: Best 'unstable' version for IMAP and how to build it

1999-09-21 Thread Chris Green
On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 02:44:34PM -0500, David DeSimone wrote: > Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > ./prepare --enable-imap > > > make > > > make install > > > > I don't have autoconf or automake installed here so I'll need them > > before I can build using ./prepare. > > It's tru

Re: Best 'unstable' version for IMAP and how to build it

1999-09-20 Thread David DeSimone
Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ./prepare --enable-imap > > make > > make install > > I don't have autoconf or automake installed here so I'll need them > before I can build using ./prepare. It's true that you need those tools in order to run the "prepare" script, but I have never i

Re: Best 'unstable' version for IMAP and how to build it

1999-09-20 Thread Chris Green
On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 07:10:42AM -0700, R. Marc wrote: > I picked up the snapshot from last friday (9/17) and it works pretty well > for me. As noted in a previous post to this group, it does die, but only > occasionally opening large mailboxes for me. I originally said about 1 in > 5 times, b

Re: Best 'unstable' version for IMAP and how to build it

1999-09-20 Thread R. Marc
Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What's a reasonable stable version of mutt to build to get the new > IMAP4 goodies? Is the current 'unstable' version a reasonable one to > go for? > Then, when I've got the source, how do I build it? I picked up the snapshot from last friday (9/17) and

Best 'unstable' version for IMAP and how to build it

1999-09-20 Thread Chris Green
What's a reasonable stable version of mutt to build to get the new IMAP4 goodies? Is the current 'unstable' version a reasonable one to go for? Then, when I've got the source, how do I build it? I can build the non-development versions but there seems to be another layer (from prepare to config