Re: Automatically encrypting to receipients based on the existance

2008-01-27 Thread Peter Münster
On Sun, Jan 27 2008, sigi wrote: > On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 05:24:36PM +0100, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > > * Clay Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-26 10:57 -0700]: > > > On 08:30 Sat 26 Jan , Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > > > > http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas/mutt.shtml > > > > > > That looks l

Re: Automatically encrypting to receipients based on the existance

2008-01-27 Thread sigi
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 05:24:36PM +0100, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > * Clay Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-26 10:57 -0700]: > > On 08:30 Sat 26 Jan , Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > > > http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas/mutt.shtml > > > > That looks like a useful patch. Is it headed for main-li

Re: Automatically encrypting to receipients based on the existance

2008-01-27 Thread Clay Barnes
On 17:24 Sun 27 Jan , Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > * Clay Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-26 10:57 -0700]: > > On 08:30 Sat 26 Jan , Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > > > http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas/mutt.shtml > > > > That looks like a useful patch. Is it headed for main-line inclusion? >

Re: Automatically encrypting to receipients based on the existance

2008-01-27 Thread Nicolas Rachinsky
* Clay Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-26 10:57 -0700]: > On 08:30 Sat 26 Jan , Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > > http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas/mutt.shtml > > That looks like a useful patch. Is it headed for main-line inclusion? Thank you. There hasn't been much feedback. Nicolas -- http

Re: Automatically encrypting to receipients based on the existance

2008-01-27 Thread Clay Barnes
On 08:30 Sat 26 Jan , Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > * Clay Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-25 22:07 -0700]: > > The subject pretty much says it all. I want to set mutt to > > automatically encrypt email to anyone who's email has a corresponding > > public key in the local gpg keyfile. I know

Re: Automatically encrypting to receipients based on the existance

2008-01-26 Thread Clay Barnes
On 18:19 Sat 26 Jan , Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > * Clay Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-26 10:13 -0700]: > > On 08:30 Sat 26 Jan , Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > > > You can use encrypt-to in your gpg.conf (see man gpg) or add > > > --encrypt-to to all the encryption commands in your mutt c

Re: Automatically encrypting to receipients based on the existance

2008-01-26 Thread Nicolas Rachinsky
* Clay Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-26 10:13 -0700]: > On 08:30 Sat 26 Jan , Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > > You can use encrypt-to in your gpg.conf (see man gpg) or add > > --encrypt-to to all the encryption commands in your mutt configuration. > > That seems to take a key fingerprint, bu

Re: Automatically encrypting to receipients based on the existance

2008-01-26 Thread Clay Barnes
On 08:30 Sat 26 Jan , Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > * Clay Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-25 22:07 -0700]: > > The subject pretty much says it all. I want to set mutt to > > automatically encrypt email to anyone who's email has a corresponding > > public key in the local gpg keyfile. I know

Re: Automatically encrypting to receipients based on the existance

2008-01-25 Thread Nicolas Rachinsky
* Clay Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-25 22:07 -0700]: > The subject pretty much says it all. I want to set mutt to > automatically encrypt email to anyone who's email has a corresponding > public key in the local gpg keyfile. I know that's more complex than > the usual send-hook entails, bu

Automatically encrypting to receipients based on the existance of a local public key (and more).

2008-01-25 Thread Clay Barnes
The subject pretty much says it all. I want to set mutt to automatically encrypt email to anyone who's email has a corresponding public key in the local gpg keyfile. I know that's more complex than the usual send-hook entails, but I think it'd be a pretty nifty way to avoid crafting and maintaini