David DeSimone wrote:
> You can start fetchmail from your /etc/ppp/ip-up script, and kill it in
> your /etc/ppp/ip-down script. The next best thing to being there.
Don't like that either. Although I send my mail that way..
The
macro index G "fetchmail"
is more what I was looking for.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > So just run fetchmail in daemon mode.
>
> Not very convenient on a dialup connection. Usually when I want my
> mail I want it NOW! (yes, I know about demand dialing) I think the
> macro suits me perfectly.
You can start fetchmail from your /etc/
Randall J. Million wrote:
> Write a macro that will call fetchmail. Should work, but I don't use
> fetchmail.
I'll look into that.
David DeSimone wrote:
> So don't leave Mutt.
>
> macro index G "fetchmail"
Sweet.
Thomas Roessler wrote:
>> Me too. Just thought it might be convenient sometimes to not have
>> to leave mutt.
>
> So just run fetchmail in daemon mode.
Not very convenient on a dialup connection. Usually when
I want my mail I want it NOW! (yes, I know about demand
dialing) I think the macro sui
On 1999-07-01 14:46:51 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Me too. Just thought it might be convenient sometimes to not have
> to leave mutt.
So just run fetchmail in daemon mode.
On Thu, Jul 01, 1999 at 06:23:17PM -0500, David DeSimone wrote:
> "David" == David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
David> Just thought it might be convenient sometimes to not have to leave
David> mutt.
David> So
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just thought it might be convenient sometimes to not have to leave
> mutt.
So don't leave Mutt.
macro index G "fetchmail"
--
David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | that there is no man real
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Why not use fetchmail instead? I'm using qmail+fetchmail+procmail+mutt
> > over here.
> Me too. Just thought it might be convenient sometimes to not have
> to leave mutt.
Write a macro that will call fetchmail. Should work, but I don't use
fetchmail.
randy
--
Fiv
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Why not use fetchmail instead? I'm using qmail+fetchmail+procmail+mutt
> over here.
Me too. Just thought it might be convenient sometimes to not have
to leave mutt.
> When I 'G'et mail using POP3 internal to mutt, it writes
> directly to my mailbox. Is there a way to pass it to my
> SMTP service (I'm using qmail) instead and have it deliver
> the mail? This way I can filter it into appropriate
> folders as it comes in.
Why not use fetchmail instead? I'm usin
Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [990701 15:33]:
> > When I 'G'et mail using POP3 internal to mutt, it writes
> > directly to my mailbox. Is there a way to pass it to my SMTP
> > service (I'm using qmail) instead and have it deliver the mail?
>
> Pr
On Wed, Jun 30, 1999 at 02:43:37PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> When I 'G'et mail using POP3 internal to mutt, it writes
> directly to my mailbox. Is there a way to pass it to my
> SMTP service (I'm using qmail) instead and have it deliver
> the mail? This way I can filter it into appropriate
Renaud Colinet( 18) | `->[OFF-TOPIC] bulk mailing
8065 X 990630 Lars Hecking ( 15) | `->
8066 X 990630 David DeSimone( 23) | `->
-> 8067 X 990630 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( 5) | `->Annoying feature
8068 X 990629 Lars Hecking ( 36) |->
8
When I 'G'et mail using POP3 internal to mutt, it writes
directly to my mailbox. Is there a way to pass it to my
SMTP service (I'm using qmail) instead and have it deliver
the mail? This way I can filter it into appropriate
folders as it comes in.
15 matches
Mail list logo
