On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 05:01:23PM +0200, Alex Huth wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 03:33:07PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 03:23:55PM +0200, Alex Huth wrote:
> > Only if it knows which ones have new mail in them! That's where we
> > came in.
> >
>
> That´s what i am talkin
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 03:33:07PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 03:23:55PM +0200, Alex Huth wrote:
> Only if it knows which ones have new mail in them! That's where we
> came in.
>
That´s what i am talking about. I am using sidebar with lot of maildirs
and the following in the
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 02:46:23PM +0200, Michael Ludwig wrote:
> Checking for new mail before a user-triggered write operation, as you
> suggested, would, I think, fix the issue.
Thank you.
After checking 114 fleas which mentioned "New mail", I've added ticket
#3424.
Erik
--
The reasonable
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 03:23:55PM +0200, Alex Huth wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 10:47:29AM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 09:07:01AM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
> > >
> > I don't really want to know when new mail arrives, what I want is the
> > ability to quickly go to all th
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 10:47:29AM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 09:07:01AM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
> >
> I don't really want to know when new mail arrives, what I want is the
> ability to quickly go to all the mailboxes which have new incoming
> mail when I'm running mutt. I
Erik Christiansen schrieb am 25.06.2010 um 20:48 (+1000):
> While that would be a lot of fun, mutt itself does seem able to be
> cured of its current fibbing behaviour. (Try copying this message to
> this mail folder. Mutt says "New mail in this mailbox." What hokum.)
Confirmed :-)
> Mutt needs
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 10:47:29AM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> I don't really want to know when new mail arrives, what I want is the
> ability to quickly go to all the mailboxes which have new incoming
> mail when I'm running mutt. I don't have any need to respond quickly
> to messages, just a need to
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 09:07:01AM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
> On Jun 24 16:09, Chris G wrote:
> > After all the recent discussion of detecting new mail etc. it occurs
> > to me that it would be very useful to be able to tell mutt that it
> > should scan all files in a particular directory for new
On Jun 24 16:09, Chris G wrote:
> After all the recent discussion of detecting new mail etc. it occurs
> to me that it would be very useful to be able to tell mutt that it
> should scan all files in a particular directory for new mail.
>
> If one does have more than one (and non-standard) incoming
On 24.06.10,16:09, Chris G wrote:
> After all the recent discussion of detecting new mail etc. it occurs
> to me that it would be very useful to be able to tell mutt that it
> should scan all files in a particular directory for new mail.
>
> If one does have more than one (and non-standard) incomi
After all the recent discussion of detecting new mail etc. it occurs
to me that it would be very useful to be able to tell mutt that it
should scan all files in a particular directory for new mail.
If one does have more than one (and non-standard) incoming mail
destinations then it's almost inevit
11 matches
Mail list logo
