Re: 95.5i compile problem

1999-05-11 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Tue, May 11, 1999 at 10:28:22AM -0500, Kenny Elliott wrote: > My /usr/include/unistd.h simply does an "#include " and my > /usr/include/asm/unistd.h which is a link to > /usr/src/linux/include/asm-i386/unistd.h has no mention of R_OK. Mine is a full file with the version comment of:

Re: 95.5i compile problem

1999-05-11 Thread Kenny Elliott
On Tue, 11 May 1999, rfi from Rich Roth wrote: > > fcntl.h does exist in my linux source tree (2.2.7) but still, why would I > > need to add this include manualy to the mutt sources? > > > BUT is the linux directories linked into the normal /usr/include like the > asm and linux directories I

Re: 95.5i compile problem

1999-05-11 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Mon, May 10, 1999 at 06:44:12PM -0500, Kenny Elliott wrote: > > > Thanks! I had to and and include for fcntl.h in compose.c, init.c, hook.c, ... > > This sounds like a config problem with your linux sources - normally fctnl.h > > is really in: > > > > /usr/include/ > > asm -> /usr/sr

Re: 95.5i compile problem

1999-05-10 Thread rfi from Rich Roth
On Mon, May 10, 1999 at 10:59:04AM -0500, Kenny Elliott wrote: > > Not enough information. Which version of Linux? On my Linux systems, > > R_OK is defined in . > > You actually supplied enough information above for me to fix the problem. > Thanks! I had to and and include for fcntl.h in compo

Re: 95.5i compile problem

1999-05-10 Thread Kenny Elliott
On Mon, 10 May 1999, rfi from Rich Roth wrote: > On Mon, May 10, 1999 at 10:59:04AM -0500, Kenny Elliott wrote: > > > > Not enough information. Which version of Linux? On my Linux systems, > > > R_OK is defined in . > > > > You actually supplied enough information above for me to fix the pr

Re: 95.5i compile problem

1999-05-10 Thread Lars Hecking
> You actually supplied enough information above for me to fix the problem. > Thanks! I had to and and include for fcntl.h in compose.c, init.c, hook.c, > postpone.c, and rfc1524.c. There is probably a better way to effect the > same change but it worked. For the possible benifit of others I am

Re: 95.5i compile problem

1999-05-10 Thread Kenny Elliott
On Mon, 10 May 1999, Lars Hecking wrote: > > > I am running Linux and am tring to get Mutt installed but the make > > is erroring out eith the following: > > Not enough information. Which version of Linux? On my Linux systems, > R_OK is defined in . You actually supplied enough inform

Re: 95.5i compile problem

1999-05-10 Thread Lars Hecking
> I am running Linux and am tring to get Mutt installed but the make > is erroring out eith the following: Not enough information. Which version of Linux? On my Linux systems, R_OK is defined in . Posting the output of configure might be helpful, too. > gcc -DSHAREDIR=\"/usr/local/sh

95.5i compile problem

1999-05-09 Thread Kenny Elliott
Hi all: I am running Linux and am tring to get Mutt installed but the make is erroring out eith the following: gcc -DSHAREDIR=\"/usr/local/share/mutt\" -DSYSCONFDIR=\"/usr/local/etc\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H=1 -I. -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include/ncurses -DDL_STANDALONE -DDOTLOCK="\"/usr/loca